p. 1−8
2717-1396
Vol.1/No.1
p. 9−15
2717-1396
Vol.1/No.1
0.05), but only, there was a negative significant relationship between salinity and diversity of phytoplankton (r2= -0.77, P<0.05).]]>
p. 17−25
2717-1396
Vol.1/No.1
p. 25−32
2717-1396
Vol.1/No.1
p. 33−39
2717-1396
Vol.1/No.1
0.05). In the third stage all the previous treatments were fed with three feeding trials, combinations of 50 and 25% of live food and the rest with formulated diet for ten days and at the end of this study, 45th days, all fish larvae were fed only with formulated diet. The results showed that all fish larvae of the second stage which had been fed artemia and formulated diet, had good and regular growth rate which there were not significantly differences between them (P>0.05) but at the end of experimental period, only treatment 1 of the second stage (100 artemia nauplii) which had been fed 50% artemia and formulated diet and 25% artemia and formulated diet selected as the best feeding model for reaching to 5g weight of fish fingerlings. Also, these treatments showed that the highest SGR, the lowest FCR and the highest survival rate after 72h exposed in 12 and 16 ppt salinity which had significant difference with the other treatment (P<0.05).]]>
p. 41−50
2717-1396
Vol.1/No.1
p. 51−56
2717-1396
Vol.1/No.1