p. 1−10
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 11−18
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
0.05). There is high significant difference in amount of diet as fed, weight increasing and survival rates between treatments brightly (P<0.01). So on, to achieve the useful providing efficiency by the suitable process guar crumpled had less amount of anti feeding effects and could be replaced by soy crumpled as a herbal protein resource.]]>
p. 19−27
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 29−38
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 39−46
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
0.05) between group A and B and also between C and D. The length and weight of fry in groups 3 and 4 were significantly higher than other groups (P<0.05). The gonadosomatic index was found lower in group 1 and 2 as compared to other groups. Moreover, no significant differences in the sex ratio were observed within the experimental groups (P>0.05).]]>
p. 47−56
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 57−64
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 65−76
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 77−84
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 85−91
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 93−101
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 103−111
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
0.05), although the highest contents of final weight and growth performance were observed in fish fed 5% red pepper (P>0.05). ]]>
p. 113−119
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 121−134
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 135−149
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 151−159
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
0/05). The skin colorimetric showed brightness indicator a significant difference in 10% of safflower treatment compared with other treatments (P≤0/05). In conjunction with redness and yellowness indices, treated with 15% safflower showed non-significant increase and decrease, respectively, compared to the control group (P>0/05). This experiment showed that the use of different levels of safflower can be effective in changing the skin color of the rainbow trout. ]]>
p. 161−166
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 167−176
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 177−185
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
0.05).]]>
p. 187−193
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
0.05) amongst various locations of each sampling station in the studied seasons (spring and summer). Results of RDA analysis showed a difference amongst various sampling stations in affecting physicochemical parameters on zooplankton density at each seasons.]]>
p. 195−208
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 209−219
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 221−230
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 231−240
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 241−244
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 245−248
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 249−255
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4
p. 257−264
2717-1396
Vol.6/No.4