p. 1−8
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 9−18
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 19−24
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 25−34
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 35−40
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 41−46
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 47−52
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
0.05). The results of this study indicated that the use of thyme had no effect on blood parameters. ]]>
p. 53−58
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 59−66
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 67−72
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 73−78
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 79−86
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 87−94
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
0.05). Egg weight had significant association with 407 bp fragment (P˂0.05) that C1C2 genotype was lighter than other two genotypes, but association were not significant with other traits (P>0.05). Results showed that ovalbumin gene has a relatively high polymorphism and could be considered in future breeding programs of native fowl herd of Isfahan.]]>
p. 95−102
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
0.05).]]>
p. 103−106
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 107−114
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 115−122
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 123−128
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 129−136
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 137−144
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 145−152
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 153−160
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 161−166
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 167−178
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 179−184
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 185−192
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
0.05). The mean white blood cells andblood cells neutrophil percentage in treatment of 3 was significantly different (P <0.05) from the controlgroup fish. Significant differences in serum complement components in the treated groups were incomparission to control group (P <0.05). ACH50 activity and immunoglobulin (IgM) did not showsignificant differences between treatments (P> 0.05). The lysozyme and serum globulins in treatment 3compared to the control treatment was higher and statistically significant (P <0.05). Although thereweren,t signs of significant effects of probioenzyme on growth and nutrition factors, Probioenzyme canhave immunological effects on rainbow trout.]]>
p. 193−204
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 205−212
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 213−222
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
0.05) except feed conversion ratio (FCR) (p<0.05). In addition, diet economic estimates for the treatment 4 (25% kilka+75% artificial diet) was 10% lower than the treatment 5 (100% artificial diet without kilka). The results of this study showed adding 25% kilka in diet of farmed Huso huso affects on its growth characteristics. Therefore, the use of 25% kilka in the daily diet of the farmed Huso huso is recommended due to kilka relative abundant and availability as well as its high nutritional value and appropriate price. ]]>
p. 223−230
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 231−236
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 237−242
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 243−248
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 249−256
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 257−262
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 263−270
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
0.05).]]>
p. 271−280
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 281−288
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
0.05). Shrimp fed diet with 100% S. platensis showed significantly higher amount of protein compared to other treatments (P<0.05). However, wasn’t found any significant differences in the amount of wet, lipid and ash between treatments (P>0.05). It was also observed that the content of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids such as alpha-linolenic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, linoleic acid and arachidonic acid was mostly higher in shrimp fed diet with microalgae than the control group (P<0.05). In conclusion, this study indicated that both microalgae especially in 25% chlorella could be incorporated in the diet of juvenile L. vannamei with no adverse effects on the performance of shrimp. ]]>
p. 289−296
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 297−302
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 303−312
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 313−320
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
0.05), but significant differences were found in between different phylum (p < 0.05). Overall, the results showed that the Anzali wetland has Eutroph condition. ]]>
p. 321−328
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 329−336
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 337−344
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 345−352
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 353−360
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 361−368
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 369−380
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 381−390
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1
p. 391−396
2717-1396
Vol.10/No.1