Determining Suitable Habitats for Roe Deer (Capreolus Capreolus) in North of Iran Using Ensemble Approach

Document Type : (original research)

Authors

1 Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

2 Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization , Karaj, Iran

3 Department of Environment, Faculty of marine natural science, Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology, Khorramshahr, Iran

Abstract

Species distribution model is important to protect and to manage the roe deer as an elusive and national protected herbivore species in Iran. In this study habitat modeling was carried out via Biomod2 package in R software environment using 91 presence points of the spices as well as environmental and human factors. Ensemble model of habitat suitability was prepared based on six species distribution model algorithms for a study area of 74000 km2. AUC for ensemble model was 0.97 which showed an excellent performance. Suitable habitat for roe deer covered an area about 15 percent of the studied area. Also, the results showed that altitude (29%) and land-use (29%) then, maximum temperature in the warmest month and slope variables were the most influential factors on species distribution. Also, the results indicate that anthropogenic factors were not much effective on the species presence. Roe deer prefers the denser forests since this habitat can reduce its visibility and provide sufficient cover and food for the species.

Keywords


  1. Ahmadi, M.; Nezami, B.; Jowkar, H.; Hemami, M.R.; Fadakar, D.; Malakouti-Khah, Sh. and Ostrowski, S., 2017. Combining Landscape Suitability and Habitat Connectivity to Conserve the Last Surviving Population of Cheetah in Asia. Diversity and Distributions. Vol. 23, No. 6, pp: 592-603.
  2. Almasieh, K; Kaboli, M. and Beier, P., 2016. Identifying habitat cores and corridors for the Iranian black bear in Iran. Ursus. Vol. 27, No. 1, Index Vol. 26, No. 1, pp: 18-30.
  3. Araújo, M.B. and New, M., 2007. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Vol. 22, No. 1, pp: 42-47.
  4. Bjilsma, R; Bundgaard, J. and Boerema, A., 2000. Does inbreeding affect the extinction risk of small populations? Predictions from Drosophila. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. Vol. 13, No. 3, pp: 502-514.
  5. Brown, J.L., 2014. SDMtoolbox: a python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic, and species distribution model analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Vol. 5, No. 7, pp: 694-700.
  6. Buisson L.; Thuiller, W.; Casajus, N.; Lek, S. and Grenouillet, G., 2010. Uncertainty in ensemble forecasting of species distribution. Global Change Biology. Vol. 16, No. 4, pp: 1145-1157.
  7. Côté, S.D.; Rooney, T.P.; Tremblay, J.P.; Dussault, C. and Waller, D.M., 2004. Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. Vol. 35, pp:113-147.
  8. Coulon, A; Cosson, J.F.; Angibault, J.M; Cargnelutti, B.; Galan, M; Morellet, N.; Petit, E.; Aulagnier, S. and Hewison, A.J.M., 2004. Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a Roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individualbased approach. Molecular Ecology. Vol. 13, No. 9, pp: 2841-2850.
  9. Development Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
  10. Dormann, C.F.; Purschke, O.; Márquez J.R.G; Lautenbach, S. and Schroder, B., 2008. Components of uncertainty in species distribution analysis: a case study of the great grey shrike. Ecology. Vol. 89, No. 12, pp: 3371-3386.
  11. Elith, J.; Graham, C.H. and Anderson, R.P., 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. Vol. 29, No. 2, pp: 129-151.
  12. Franklin, J., 2009. Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  13. Guisan, A.; Zimmermann, N.E.; Elith, J.; Graham, C.H.; Phillips, H. and Peterson, A.T., 2007. What Matters for Predicting the Occurrences of Trees: Techniques, Data, or Species' characteristics? Ecological Monographs. Vol. 77, No. 4, pp: 615-630.
  14. Heikkinen, R.K.; Luoto, M.; Kuussaari, M. and Toivonen, T., 2007. Modelling the spatial distribution of a threatened butterfly: impacts of scale and statistical technique. Landscape and Urban Planning. Vol. 79, No. 3-4, pp: 347-357.
  15. http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/(accessed 15 July 2018).
  16. IFRWMO (Forest, Range and Watershed Management Organization of Iran). 2010. Iranian Forests, Range and Watershed Management Organization National Land use/Land cover map.
  17. Ineichen, P., 2015. Habitat selection of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a landscape of fear shaped by human recreation. Master thesis. Department of Environmental Systems Science (D-USYS), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich.
  18. Jiang, G.; Zhang, M. and Ma, J., 2008. Habitat use and separation between red deer Cervus elaphus xanthopygus and roe deer Capreolus pygargus bedfordi in relation to human disturbance in the Wandashan Mountains, northeastern China. Wildlife Biology. Vol. 14, No. 1, pp: 92-100.
  19. Lovaris, S.; Serrao, G. and Mori, E., 2017. Woodland features determining home range size of roe deer, Behavioural Processes. Vol. 140, pp: 115-120.
  20. Martin, J.; Vourc’h, G.; Bonnot, N.; Cargnelutti, B.; Chaval, Y., Lourtet, B.; Goulard, M.; Hoch, T.; Plantard, O.; Hewison, A.J.M. and Morellet, N., 2018. Temporal shifts in landscape connectivity for an ecosystem engineer, the roe deer, across a multiple-use landscape. Landscape ecology. Vol. 33, No. 6, pp: 937-954.
  21. Mysterud, A. and Ostbye, E., 1999. Cover as a habitat element for temperate ungulates: effects on habitat selection and demography. Wildlife Society. Vol. 27, No. 2, pp: 385-394.
  22. Pandini, W. and Cesaris, C., 1997. Home range and habitat use of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) reared in captivity and released in the wild. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy. Vol. 9, pp: 1-2.
  23. Pellerin, M.; Calenge, C.; Saïd, S.; Gaillard, J.M.; Fritz, H.; Duncan, P. and Van Laere, G., 2010. Habitat use by female western roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): influence of resource availability on habitat selection in two contrasting years. Canadian Journal of Zoology. Vol. 88, No. 11, pp: 1052-1062.
  24. Phillips, S.J; Anderson, R.P. and Schapire, R.E., 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modeling. Vol. 190, No. 3-4, pp: 231-259.
  25. Rundel, P.W; Montenegro, G. and Jaksic, F.M., 1998. Landscape disturbance and biodiversity in Mediterranean type ecosystems. Springer. New York, US. 451 p.
  26. Sagheb Talebi, Kh., Sajedi, T. and Pourhashemi, M., 2014. Forests of Iran: A Treasure from the Past, a Hope for the Future, Springer. 152 p.
  27. Seoane, J; Justribo, J.H.; Garcia, F.; Retamar, J.; Rabadan, C. and Atienza, J.C., 2006. Habitat-suitability modelling to assess the effects of land-use changes on Dupont’s lark Chersophilus duponti: a case study in the Layna Important Bird Area. Biological Conservation.
    Vol. 128, No. 2, pp: 241-252.
  28. Titeux, N.; Dufrene, M.; Radoux, J.; Hirzel, A.H. and Defourny P., 2007. Fitness-related parameters improve presence-only distribution modelling for conservation practice: The case of the red-backed shrike. Biological Conservation. Vol. 138, No. 1-2, pp: 207-223.
  29. Thuiller, W., 2003. BIOMOD-optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Global change biology. Vol. 9, No. 10, pp: 1353-1362.
  30. Thuiller, W.; Lafourcade, B.; Engler, R., and Araújo, M.B., 2009. BIOMOD-a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography. Vol. 32, No. 3, pp: 369-373.
  31. Welch, D.; Staines, B.W.; Catt, D.C. and Scott, D., 1990. Habitat usage by red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deer in a Scottish Sitka spruce plantation. Journal of Zoology. Vol. 221, No. 3, pp: 453-476.
  32. Zaniewski, A.E.; Lehmann, A. and Overton, J.M., 2002. Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns. Ecological Modelling. Vol. 157, No. 2-3, pp: 261-280.