مقایسه عملکرد تولیدمثلی گاوهای سمینتال- هلشتاین با هلشتاین در استان گلستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

بخش تحقیقات علوم دامی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان، ایران

10.22034/AEJ.2021.297712.2601

چکیده

این تحقیق با هدف مقایسه عملکرد تولید‌مثلی گاوهای نژاد خالص هلشتاین و آمیخته­ های هلشتاین-سمینتال با نسبت 50:50 و 25:75 در یکی از گاوداری­ های استان گلستان انجام شد. در این تحقیق شاخص ­های تولید‌مثلی شامل سن‌ اولین ‌تلقیح، سن ‌اولین ‌زایش، طول مدت آبستنی، تعداد روزهای باز، فاصله‌گوساله‌زایی و وزن تولدگوساله مورد بررسی قرار‌ گرفت. بین گاوهای نژاد خالص هلشتاین و آمیخته­ های هلشتاین–سمینتال با نسبت 50:50 از نظر شاخص سن‌ اولین‌ تلقیح و سن ‌اولین ‌زایش اختلاف معنی‌داری وجود نداشت اما این اختلاف بین آمیخته ­های هلشتاین– سمینتال با نسبت 50:50 و 25:75 معنی ­دار بود (p<0/05). هم چنین شاخص سن اولین تلقیح بین گاوهای نژاد خالص هلشتاین با آمیخته ­های هلشتاین-سمینتال با نسبت 25:75 معنی­ دار بود (p<0/05). تفاوت میانگین تعداد روز‌های‌ باز درگاوهای نژاد خالص هلشتاین با آمیخته ­های هلشتاین-سمینتال با نسبت 25:75 معنی­ دار نبود، درحالی که با آمیخته­ های هلشتاین–سمینتال با نسبت 50:50 در دوره شیردهی اول و سوم معنی ­دار بود (p<0/05). در این تحقیق فاصله گوساله­ زایی بین نژادهای خالص هلشتاین و آمیخته­ های هلشتاین– سمینتال با نسبت 50: 50 در دوره شیردهی اول و دوم معنی­ دار بود (p<0/05). میانگین وزن تولدگوساله در دوره شیردهی اول و دوم در گاوهای نژادخالص هلشتاین (به ­ترتیب 41/228 و 43/787 کیلوگرم) بیش تر از آمیخته ­های هلشتاین–سمینتال با نسبت 50:50 (به ­ترتیب 40/32 و 41/107 کیلوگرم) و در آمیخته ­های هلشتاین-سمینتال با نسبت 50:50 (40/32 کیلوگرم) بیش تر از آمیخته ­های هلشتاین-سمینتال با نسبت 25:75 (36/6 کیلوگرم) بود، اما این اختلاف معنی‌دار نبود. نتایج این تحقیق نشان می دهد راندمان تولیدمثل برای شاخص‌های تعداد روزهای باز و فاصله گوساله‌زایی در آمیخته­ های هلشتاین-سمینتال و سن اولین تلقیح آمیخته­ های سمینتال- هلشتاین با نسبت 75: 25 بهتر از نژاد خالص هلشتاین است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of reproductive performance of Seminal-Holstein cows with Holstein in Golestan province

نویسنده [English]

  • Mokhtar Mohajer
Department of Animal Science Research, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Gorgan, Iran
چکیده [English]

The aim of this study were carried out to compare reproduction performance of pure Holstein and crossbreds of Holestein-Simmental (50H:50S and 25H:75S) that kept in one farm located in Golstan Province. Reproductive parameters including age of first insemination, age of first calving, gestation length, open days, calving interval and calf birth weight were studied. The Pure Holstein and Holestein- Simmental (50H:50S and 25H:75S) were not different for age at first insemination and age at first calving. The open days had significant influence on Pure breed Holstein and Holestein- Simmental (50H:50S) during the first and third lactation. In this study, the calving distance between pure Holstein breeds and Holstein-Seminal crossbred was significant with a ratio of 50H:50S in the first and second lactation (p<0.05). Calf birth weight in pure Holstein breed (41.228 and 43.787 Kg) were more than Holestein- Simmental crossbred (50H:50S), (40.32 and 41.107 Kg) during the first and second lactation and that was in Holestein- Simmental crossbred (50H:50S), (40.32 Kg) more than Holestein- Simmental crossbred (25H:75S), (36.6 Kg) but there was no significant difference between them. The results of this study indicate that the reproductive performance of Holestein- Simmental crossbred for open days and calving interval and the age of the first inoculation of Seminal-Holstein crossbred with a ratio of 25H:75S were better than Pure Holstein.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Performance
  • Reproductive
  • Holestein
  • Simmental-Holestein crossbred
  • Golstan

مراجع

  • Bewely, J.M. and Schutz, M.M., 2008. An interdisciplinary review of body condition scoring for dairy cattle: A review. J. Pro. Anim. Sci. 24: 507-529.
  • Seyedsharifi, R., Karrari niri, Q., Hedayat Evrigh, N., seifdavati, J. and Bohlouli, M., Genetic analysis of some type, production, reproduction and longevity traits in Isfahan province Holsteins. Journal of Animal Environmental. 9(3): 17-26. (In Persian)
  • Schwaiger, V., 2008. KreuzungszuchtbeimMilchvieh-einAusblickVorund Nachteile der Kreuzungszucht zwishen Deutchem Fleckvieh und Deutschen Holstein. Thesis. Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich. Munich. Germany
  • Brähmig, J., 2011. Einfluss der Wechselkreuzung von Deutschen Holsteins und Deutschem Fleckvieh auf Milchleistung und Milchqualität in einem automatischen Melksystem, Thesis. Ludwig-MaximiliansUniversity of Munich. Munich. Germany.
  • Heins, B.J. and Hansen, L.B., 2012. Short communication: Fertility, somatic cell score, and production of Normande × Holstein, Montbéliarde×Holstein, and Scandinavian Red×Holstein crossbreds versus pure Holsteins during their first 5 lactations. Journal of Dairy Science. 95(2): 918-924.
  • Mendonça, L.G.D., Abade, C.C., da Silva, E.M., Litherland, N.B., Hansen, L.B., Hansen, W.P. and Chebel, R.C., 2014. Comparison of peripartum metabolic status and postpartum health of Holstein and Montbéliarde-sired crossbred dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 97(2): 805-818.
  • Rahbar, R., 2020. Effect of age at first calving (AFC) on yield, variance components and genetic trend of productive traits of Holstein cows in Isfahan province. Journal of Animal Environmental. 11(4): 53-60. (In Persian)
  • Pericic, P., Skalicki, M., Petrovic, M., Bogdanovic, V. and Ruzic-Muslic, D., 2009. Simmental cattle breed in different production systems. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. 25 (5-6): 315-326.
  • Heins, B.J., Hansen, L.B., Seykora, A.J., Johnson, D.G., Linn, J.G., Romano, J.E. and Hazel, A.R., 2008. Crossbreds of Jersey x Holstein compared with pure Holsteins for production, fertility, and body and udder measurements during first lactation. Journal of Dairy Science. 91(3): 1270-1278.
  • Auldist, M.J., Pyman, M.F.S., Grainger, C. and Macmillan, K.L., 2007. Comparative Reproductive Performance and Early Lactation Productivity of Jersey×Holstein Cows in Predominantly Holstein Herds in a Pasture-Based Dairying System. Journal of Dairy Science. 90(10): 4856-4862.
  • Cassell, B., 2010. Dairy CrossbreedingBennetCassell, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech)Jack McAllister, University of Kentucky.
  • Piccand, V., Cutullic, E., Schori, F., Kunz, P., Troxler, J., Wanner, M. and Thomet, P., 2005. Comparison of Swiss breeds with New Zealand Holstein-Friesian inpasture-based, seasonal-calving systems. Grassland Science in Europe. 16: 380-382.
  • Budimir, D., Plavsic, A. and Popovic-Vranjes, A., 2011. Production and reproduction characteristics of simmental and Holstein-Friesian cows in semberija area. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. 27(3): 893-899.
  • Gorji, R., Ghorbani, Gh.R., Rahmani, H.R. and Sadeghi-Sefidmazgi, A., 2015. Phenotypic analysis of fertility in Holstein dairy cattle of Iran. Journal of Ruminant Research. 3(2): 1490-162.  (In Persian)
  • Dufour, J.J., 1975. Influence of post-Weaning growth rate on puberty and ovarian activity in heifers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 55: 93-100.
  • Ferrell, C.L., 1982. Effect of postweaning rate of gain on onset of puberty and productive performance of heifers of different breeds. J. Anim. Sci. 55: 1272-1283.
  • Hare, E., Norman, H.D. and Wright, J.R., 2006. Trends in calving Intervals for Dairy cattle breeds in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 89: 365-370.
  • Faraji Arough, H., Aslaminejad, A.A. and Farhangfar, H., 2011. Estimation of Genetic Parameters and Trends for Age at First Calving and Calving Interval in Iranian Holstein Cows. Journal of Research in Agricultural Science. 7(1): 79-87.
  • Makgahlela, M.L., Banga, C.B., Norris, D., Dzama, K. and Ngambi, J.W., 2008. Genetic analysis of age at first calving and calving interval in South African Holstein cattle. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advance. 3(4): 197-205.
  • Baker, J.F. and Boyd, M.E., 2003. Evaluation of age of Dam effects on maternal performance of multi lactation daughters from high and low milk EPD sire at three locations in the southern united states. J. Anim Sci. 81: 1693-1699.
  • Banos, G., Brotherstone, S. and Coffey, M.P., 2007. Parental maternal effects on body condition score, female fertility and milk yield of Dairy cows. J. dairy Sci. 90: 3490-3499.
  • Wray, N.R., Quass, R.L. and Pollak, E.J., 1987. Analysisofgestationlengthin Americansimmentalcattle. Anim. Sci. 65: 970-974.
  • Olson, K.M., Cassell, B.G., McAllister, A.J. and Washburn, S.P., 2009. Dystocia, stillbirth, gestation length, and birth weight in Holstein, Jersey, and reciprocal crosses from a planned experiment. Journal of Dairy Science. 92(12): 6167-6175.
  • Hansen, M., Misztal, I., Lund, M.S., Pedersen, J. and Christensen, L.G., 2004. Undesired phenotypic and genetic trend for stillbirth in Danish Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 87: 1477-1486.
  • Dematawena, C.M.B. and Berger, P.J., 1997. Effect of dystocia on yield, fertility, and cow losses and an economic evaluation of dystocia scores for Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 80: 754-761.
  • Chew, B.P., Maier, L.C., Hillers, J.K. and Hodgson, A.S., 1981. Relationship Between Calf Birth Weight and Dam's Subsequent 200- and 305-Day Yields of Milk, Fat, and Total Solids in Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 64(12): 2401-2408.
  • Meijering, A., 1984. Dystocia and stillbirth in cattle- A review of causes, relations and implications. Livest. Prod. Sci. 11: 143-177.
  • Linden, T.C., Bicalho, R.C. and Nydam, D.V., 2009. Calf birth weight and its association with calf and cow survivability, disease incidence, reproductive performance, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 2580-2588.
  • Coffey, M.P., Hickey, J. and Brotherstone, S., 2006. Genetic Aspects of Growth of Holstein-Friesian Dairy Cows from Birth to Maturity. Journal of Dairy Science. 89: 322-329.
  • Swali, A. and Wathes, D.C., 2006. Influence of the dam and sire on size at birth and subsequent growth, milk production and fertility in dairy heifers. Theriogenology. 66: 1173-1184.
  • Heravi Moussavi, A.R., Danesh Mesgaran, M. and Vafa, T., 2013. Factors affecting reproductive performance of Holstein Dairy Cows. Journal of Ruminant Research. 1(2): 75-91. (In Persian)
  • Silva del Río, N., Stewart, S., Rapnicki, P., Chang, Y. and Fricke, P., 2007. An observational analysis of twin births, calf sex ratio, and calf mortality in Holstein dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 90: 1255-1264.
  • Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, N., Nejati-Javaremi, A., Miraei-Ashtiani, S.R. and Kohram, H., 2008. An Observational Analysis of Twin Births, Calf Stillbirth, Calf Sex Ratio, and Abortion in Iranian Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 91: 4198-4205.
  • Washburn, S.P., Silvia, W.J., Brown, C.H., McDaniel, B.T. and McAllister, A.J., 2002. Trends in reproductive performance in Southeastern Holstein and Jersey DHI herds. Journal of Dairy Science. 85: 244-251.
  • Hemmati, M., Zare Shahneh, A. and Vaez Tarshizi, R., 2015. Investigating some effective factors on reproductive performance in Holstein cows in Tehran province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 37(1): 831-837. (In Persian)
  • Adeli, S.H., Zamiri, M.J., Roghani, A. and Kafi, M., 2008. Structures affecting the reproductive performance of female Holstein cows in Fars province. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research. 1(1): 1-10. (In Persian)
  • Motamedi, M., 2003. Investigating some factors affecting reproductive performance in two herds of Holstein cows in Isfahan province. The thesis for a master's degree. University of Tehran. (In Persian)
  • Ghahramani, M., 2015. Investigating some factors affecting the reproductive performance of Holstein cows in Zanjan province. The thesis for a master's degree. University of Tehran. (In Persian)
  • Oseni, S., Misztal, I., Tsuruta, S. and Rekaya, R., 2003. Seasonality of days open in US Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 86: 3718-3725.
  • Pinedo, P.J. and De Vries, A., 2010. Effect of days to conception in the previous lactation on the risk of death and live culling around calving. J.Dairy Sci. 93: 968-977.
  • Aline Knob, D., Regina Moro Alessio, D., Thaler Neto, A. and Desconsi Mozzaquatr, F., 2016. Reproductive performance and survival of Holstein and Holstein × Simmental crossbred cow. Trop Anim Health Prod. 48: 1409-1413.
  • Roche, J.R., Friggens, N.C., Kay, J.K., Fisher, M.W., Stafford, K.J. and Berry, D.P., 2009. Invited review: body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. Journal of Dairy Science, Champaign. 92(12): 5769-5801.
  • Zamiri, M.J., 2013. Reproduction in cattle. Publications of Shiraz University Publishing Center. 117-325. (In Persian)
  • Pahlavan Afshar, K., Honarvar, M. and Lavvaf, A., 2012. Estimated economic value of estrous detection using bio-economic model in Iranian Holestein herds. J. Anim. Sci. Res. 12: 37-50. (In Persian).
  • Toghiani Pozveh, S., Shadparvar, A.A., Moradi Shahrbabak, M. and Taromsari, M., 2009. Genetic analysis of reproduction traits and their relationship with conformation traits in Holstein cows. Livestock Science. 125: 84-87.

 

فصلنامه محیط زیست جانوری
دوره 14، شماره 2
تیر 1401
صفحه 35-42

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار