Development of the conservation area network using systematic conservation planning approach in Iran

Document Type : Biodiversity

Authors

Department of Environment, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Considering the importance of conservation of biodiversity in the country, the proper selection of conservation areas representing wildlife and habitat diversity of the country is essential. Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the performance of current conservation area network in conservation of biodiversity throughout the country and to introduce new conservation areas to improve biodiversity coverage inside the network by applying systematic conservation planning. To do so, a number of 126 biodiversity surrogates including 20 mammals, 20 birds, 53 reptiles, 10 amphibians, 19 ecoregion classes and 4 high species richness classes of monocotyledon endemic plants were chosen and their current conservation level were investigated. The results indicated that for 43 vertebrates, 11 ecoregion classes and 2 class of endemic monocotyledons less than 10% of available geographical ranges are under conservation inside the present conservation area network. Moreover, the application of the conservation planning software Marxan to introduce new complementary conservation areas to current network indicated that about 20% to 30% of the country area should be conserved. Moreover, 15% of the country area is completely irreplaceable in conservation of its biodiversity. The result of this research suggests new areas to the department of environment of Iran to be introduce to the current conservation area network. While, it considers important factors such as the least possible area and anthropogenic conflicts and the highest efficiency in conservation of biodiversity.

Keywords

References

  1. Ardron, J.A.; Possingham, H.P. and Klein, C.J., 2008. Marxan good practices handbook. Pacific Marine Analysis and Research Association, Vancouver.
  2. Ball, I.R. and Possingham, H.P., 2000. Marxan version 1.8.3. Available at: http://www.ecology.uq. edu.au/marxan.htm.
  3. Ball, I.R.; Possingham, H.P. and Watts, M.E., 2009. Marxan & relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization. In Moilanen A, Wilson KA & Possingham HP (eds.). Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp: 185-195.
  4. Bonn, A.; Rodrigues, A.S.L. and Gaston, J., 2002. Threatened and endemic species: are they good indicators of patterns of biodiversity on a national scale? Ecology Letters. Vol. 5, pp: 733-741.
  5. Carwardine, J.; Rochester, W.A.; Richardson, K.S.; Williams, K.J.; Pressey, R.L. and Possingham, H.P., 2007. Conservation planning with irreplaceability: does the method matter? Biodiversity Conservation. Vol. 16, pp: 245-258.
  6. Ciarleglio, M.; Barnes, W. and Sarkar, S., 2009. ConsNet: New software for the selection of conservation area networks with spatial and multi criteria analyses. Ecography. Vol. 32, pp: 205-209.
  7. Delavenne, J.; Metcalfe, K.; Smith, R.J.; Vaz, S.; Martin, C.S.; Dupuis, L.; Coppin, F. and Carpentier, A., 2011. Systematic conservation planning in the eastern English Channel: comparing the Marxan and Zonation decision support tools. ICES Journal of Marine Science. Vol. 69, No. 1, pp: 75-83.
  8. Elith, J.; Phillips, S.J.; Hastie, T.; Dudík, M.; Chee, Y.E. and Yates, C.J., 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and distributions. Vol. 17, pp: 43-57.
  9. Esfandeh, S.; Kaboli, M. and Eslami, L., 2015. A chronological review on application of Marxan tool for systematic conservation planning in landscape. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS). Vol. 2, No. 12: pp: 2439-3661.
  10. Farashi, A. and Shariati, M., 2017. Biodiversity hotspots and conservation gaps in Iran. Journal for Nature conservation. Vol. 39, pp: 37-57.
  11. Franklin, J., 2009. Mapping species distributions; spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Game, E.T. and Grantham, H.S., 2008. Marxan User Manual: For Marxan version 1.8.10. University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia, and PacificMarine Analysis and Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  13. Garson, J.; Aggarwal, A. and Sarkar, S., 2002. ResNet Manual, V.1.2. University of Texas at Austin,Biodiversity and Biocultural Conservation Laboratory.
  14. Hijmans, R.J.S.E.; Cameron, J.L.; Parra, P.G. and Jones, Jarvis, A., 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology. Vol. 25, pp:1965-1978.
  15. IUCN. 2003. Recommendations of the Vth IUCN World Parks Congress. World Parks Congress Durban 2003. Benefits Beyond Boundaries, Durban, South Africa, 8-17 September 2003. Available online at:http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/recommendationen.pdf.
  16. Jimenez-Valverde, A. and Lobo, J.M., 2007.Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either or presence absence. Acta Oecologica. Vol. 31, pp: 361-369.
  17. Lessmann, J.; Munoz, J. and Bonaccorso, E., 2014. Maximizing species conservation in continental Ecuador; a case of systematic conservation planning for biodiverse regions. Ecology and Evolution. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1102.
  18. Liu, C.; White, M. and Newell, G., 2009. Measuring the accuracy of species distribution models: a review. 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Carins, Australia.
  19. Margules, C.R. and Pressey, R.L., 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature. Vol. 405, pp:243-253.
  20. Margules, C.R. and Sarkar, S., 2007. Systematic Conservation Planning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  21. Moilanen, A.; Wilson, K.A. and Possingham, H.P., 2009. Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 320 p.
  22. Olson, D.M.; Dinerstein, E. and Wikramanayake, E.D., 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world; a new map of life on earth. BioScience. Vol. 51, No. 11, pp:933-938.
  23. Pawar, S.; Koo, M.S.; Ahmed, M.F.; Chaudhuri, S. and Sarkar, S., 2007. Conservation assessment and prioritization of areas in Northeast India: priorities for amphibians and reptiles. Biological Conservation. Vol. 136, pp:346-361.
  24. Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P., Schapire, R.E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological modelling. Vol. 190, No.3, pp: 231-259.
  25. Possingham, H.P.; Ball, I.R. and Andelman, S., 2000. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. In: Ferson S, Burgman M (Eds.), Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp: 291-305.
  26. Possingham, H.P.; Wilson, K.A.; Andelman, S.J. and Vynne, C.H., 2006. Protected areas. Goals, limitations, and design. pp: 507-549 in M. J. Groom, G. K. Meffe, C. R. Carroll, eds. Principles of conservation biology. 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, MA.
  27. Pressey, R.L., 1997. Priority conservation areas: towards an operational definition for regional assessments in: J.J. Pigram and Sundell RC, Editors, National Parks and Protected Areas: Selection, Delimitation, and Management, Centre for Water Policy Research, Armidale, New South Wales. pp: 337-357.
  28. Pressey, R.L., 1998. Algorithms, politics and timber: an example of the role of science in a public, political negotiation process over new conservation areas in production forests in: R.T. Wills and Hobbs RJ, Editors, Ecology for Everyone: Communicating Ecology to Scientists, the Public and the Politicians, Chipping Norton, Surrey Beatty and Sons, NSW. pp: 73-87.
  29. Pressey, R.L., 2009. The C-Plan conservation planning system: Origins, applications, and possible futures. In Moilanen A, Wilson KA & Possingham HP (eds.). Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp: 211-234.
  30. Rondinini, C.; Chiozza, F. and Boitani, L., 2006. High human density in the irreplaceable sites for African vertebrate conservation. Biological Conservation. Vol. 133, No. 3, pp: 358-363.
  31. Rodrigues, A.S.L. and Brooks, T.M., 2007. Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: The effectiveness of surrogates. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. Vol. 38, pp: 713-737.
  32. Rouget, M.; Cowling, R.M.; Pressey, R.L. and Richardson, D.M., 2003. Identifying spatial components of ecological and evolutionary processes for regional conservation planning in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Diversity and Distribution. Vol. 9, pp: 191-210.
  33. Sanderson, E.W.; Jaiteh, M.; Levy, M.A.; Redford, K.H.; Wannebo, A.V. and Woolmer, G., 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience. Vol. 52, pp: 891-904.
  34. Soule, M.E. and Sanjayan, M.A., 1998. Ecology conservation targets: Do they help? Science. Vol. 279, pp: 2060-2061.
  35. Stewart, R.R. and Possingham, H.P., 2005. Efficiency, costs and trade-offs in marine reserve system design. Environmental Modeling and Assessment. Vol. 10, pp: 203-213.
  36. Wiz, M.S.; Hijmans, R.J.; Li, J.; Peterson, A.T.; Graham, C.H. and Guisan, A., 2008. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. NCEAS predicting species distribution working group, Diversity and Distribution. Vol. 14, pp: 763-773.
  37. Wu, R.; Long, Y.; Malanson, G.P.; Garber, P.A. and Zhang, S., 2014. Optimized Spatial Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation in China: A Systematic Conservation Planning Perspective. PLoS ONE. Vol. 9, No. 7: e103783.
Journal of Animal Environment
Volume 10, Issue 4
December 2018
Pages 147-162

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics