The effects of artificial insemination and natural mating on performance of Iranian honey bee (Apis mellifera M.) colonies

Document Type : Animal science

Authors

1 Animal Science Department, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardebil, Iran

2 Animal Science Department, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardebil, Iran, Iran

Abstract

Instrumental insemination is an important tool that provides complete control of honey bee mating for research and breeding purposes. In this research, the effects of artificial insemination (AI) and natural mating (NM) on performance of Iranian honey bee (Apis mellifera M.) colonies were investigated. In this research, 10 hives for natural mating and 10 hives for artificial insemination were considered. Comparisons of mean of data were performed based on T-test. The traits examined in this experiment were included measuring the adult population of bees, broods viability, hygienic behavior and pollen collection in the spring and fall seasons. The results showed that the adult population size in AI group was higher than NM group over two seasons (P<0.05). Hygienic behavior in AI group was significantly better than Nm group in the fall season. There was not found a significant difference between the AI and NM in brood viability factor. In general, the results showed that the performance of the AI group was better than NM group.

Keywords


  1. Abdulaziz, S.; Qarni, AL.; Smith, H.B.and Cobey, S., 2003. Performance Evaluation of Naturally mated and instrumentally inseminated honey bee Queens in field colonies. Pakistan journal of biological sciences. Vol. 1,
    pp: 1476-1481.
  2. Bigio, G.; Schürch, R. and Ratnieks, F.L.W., 2013. Hygienic behavior in honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae): effects of brood, food, and time of the year. Journal of Economic Entomology. Vol. 106, No. 6, pp: 2280-2285.
  3. Bigio, G.; Al Toufailia, H.; Hughes, W.O.H. and Ratnieks, F.L.W., 2014. The effect of one generation of controlled mating on the expression of hygienic behaviour in honey bees. Journal of Apicultural Research. Vol. 53, No. 5, pp: 563-568.
  4. Cermak, K., 2004. Evaluation of artificially inseminated and naturally mated bee queens in Zubli. Czech Republic (in Czech Vcelarstvi). Vol. 57, pp: 148-149.
  5. Cobey, W.S., 2007. Comparison studies of instrumentally inseminated and naturally mated honeybee queens and factors affecting their performance. Apidologie. Vol. 38, pp: 390-404.
  6. Cobey, W.S.; Tarpy, D.R. and Woyke, J., 2013. Standard methods for instrumental insemination of Apis mellifera queens. Journal of Apicultural Research. Vol. 52, No. 4, pp: 1-18.
  7. DeGrandi-Hoffman, G.; Wardell, G.; Ahumada-segura, F.; Rinderer, T.; Danka, R. and Pettis, J., 2008. Comparisons of pollen substitute diets for honey bees: consumption rates by colonies and effects on brood and adult populations. Journal of apicultural research and bee world. Vol. 47, pp: 265-270.
  8. Delaney, A.D.; Keller, J.J.; Caren, J.R. and Tarpy, D.R., 2010. The physical, insemination, and reproductive quality of honey bee queens (Apis mellifera l.). Apidologie. ©INRA/DIB-AGIB/EDP Sciences.
  9. Gençer, H.V. and Kahya1, Y., 2011. The viability of sperm in lateral oviducts and spermathecae of instrumentally inseminated and naturally mated honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queens. Journal of Apicultural Research. Vol. 50, No. 3, pp: 190-194.
  10. Kocher, S.D.; Tarpy, D.R. and Grozinger, C.M., 2010. The effects of mating and instrumental insemination on queen honey bee flight behavior and gene expression. Insect Molecular Biology. Vol. 19, No. 2, pp: 153-162.
  11. Laidlaw, H.H.Jr., 2013. Instrumental Insemination of Honey Bee Queens”, Northern Bee Books. pp: 38-63.
  12. Mackensen, O., 1947. Effect of carbon dioxide on initial oviposition of artificially inseminated and virgin queen bees, J. Econ. Entomol. Vol. 40, pp: 344-349.
  13. Mackensen, O. and Roberts, W.C., 2013. A manual for the Artificial Insemination of Queen Bees, Editura Northern Bee Books. pp: 22-29.
  14. Mohebodini, H.; Tahmasbi, G.; Dastar, B.; Jafari Ahangari, Y. and Zerehdaran, S., 2013. Effect of dietary thiamine on growth of the Iranian honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera meda) in different seasons. Agriculture and Forestry. Vol. 59, No. 3, pp: 119-126.
  15. Moritz R.F. and Kühnert, M., 1984. Seasonal effects on artificial insemination oh honeybee queen (Apis mellifera L.). Apidologie. Vol.15, pp: 223-231.
  16. Pilar, D.R.; Jaffe, R.; Munoz, I.; Serrano, J.; Moritz, R.F.A. and Krauss, B.F., 2013. Conserving genetic diversity in the honeybee, Molecular Ecology. Vol. 22, pp: 3208-3210.
  17. Rhodes, J.W.; Harden, S.; Spooner-Hart, R.; Anderson, D.L. and Wheen, G., 2010. Effects of age, season and genetics on semen and sperm production in Apis mellifera drones. Apidologie. ©INRA/DIB-AGIB/EDP Sciences.
  18. Sharma, V.P. and Kumar, N.R., 2010. Changes in honeybee behavior and biology under the influence of cellphone radiations. Current Science. Vol. 98, pp: 1376-1378.
  19. Szalai, E., 1995. Results of instrumental insemination of queen honey bees in Hungary, Pszcelnicze Zeszyty Nnaukowe. Vol. 39, pp: 6-69.
  20. Wu-Smart, J. and Spivak, M., 2016. Sub-lethal effects of dietary neonicotinoid insecticide exposure on honey bee queen fecundity and colony development. Scientific Reports. Vol. 6, pp: 1-11.