Efficiency of new acaricide Envidor speed (24% SC) compared with the common acaricides for control European red mite in apple orchards of West and East Azerbajian and Khorasan provinces

Document Type : Animal science

Authors

1 Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO). Tehran, Iran

2 Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Training Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO). Mashhad, Iran

3 Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Training Center of East Azarbaijan Province, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO). Tabriz, Iran

4 Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Training Center of West Azerbaijan Province, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO). Urmia, Iran

Abstract

The European red mite, Panonychus ulmi Koch is one of the most important pests of apple orchards in different parts of Iran. The present study was conducted in apple orchards of Azarbaijan-e Sharghi, Azarbaijan-e Gharbi and Khorasan-e Razavi provinces in a randomized complete block design with 7 treatments and 4 replicates. Treatments were the new acaricide, Envidor speed with two dosage, 0.4 and 0.5 ml/L, Baroque 10%SC 0.4 ml/L, Propargite 0.57 EC 1 ml/L , Pride 20% 0.4 ml/L, Envidor 0.24 SC 0.5 ml/lit and a check treatment by spaying water. Mean number of mites per leaf was counted one day befor and 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after spraying. Results showed that both concentrations of Envidor speed were more effective than the other acaricides after 7 days, and this trend continued until 28 days. Envidor speed had better effect with more durability effect on the control of European red mite compared to the other acaricides. We recommend the 0.4 ml/lit dose of this acaricide because of its economic efficiency.

Keywords


  1. Fischer, R. and Benet Buchholz, J., 2002. Chemistry and stereochemistry of Spirodiclofen (BAJ2740). Pflanzen Schutz- Nacbrichten Bayer. Vol. 55, No. 2-3, pp: 137-148.
  2. Haug, G. and Hoffmann, H., 1989. Chemistery of plant protection. Springer, Verlag.  Vol. 2.   
  3. Henderson, C.F. and Tilton, E.W., 1955. Teast with acaricides against the brow wheat mite. Journal of Economic Entomology. Vol. 48, pp: 157-161. 
  4. Maeyer, L. and Geerinck, P., 2011. The multiple target use of spirodiclofen (Envidor 240SC) in IPM pomefruit in Belgium. Communication in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences. Vol. 4, No. 1, pp: 225-232.   
  5. Marcic, D.; Mutavdzic, S.; Prjana, M. and Peric, P., 2011. Field and greenhouse evaluation of spirodiclofen against Panonychus ulmi and Tetranychus urticae in Serbia. Zoosymposia. Doi, http://dx.doi.org./10.11646/zoosymposia.
  6. Meyer, M.K.P., 1987. African Tetranychidae (Acari: Prostigmata) with refrences of the world genera. Republic of South Africa, Department of Agriculture and Water Supply. Entomology Memoir. Vol. 69, pp: 72-74.
  7. SAS Inc. 2003. Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc. Cary. Nc. USA.
  8. SPSS Inc. 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 21.0.Armonk, NY: IBM Crop
  9. Tomlin, C.D.S., 2003. The pesticides Manual. BCPC. 1343 p.