Comparison of the Effect of Social Restrictions on Covid-19 pandemic on Nitrogen Dioxide Pollutant in Five Wildlife Refuges and their Large Neighboring Cities in Iran

Document Type : Animal environment

Authors

1 Shahryar Technical College of Agriculture, Technical and Vocational University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences , Varamin Pishva branch, Islamic Azad University, Pishva, Iran

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Covid-19 pandemic and the resulting social restrictions on changes in nitrogen dioxide levels at five Iranian wildlife refuges, including Heydari, Miankaleh, Qomishlu, Bakhtegan and Shadegan, and five large cities close to them including Mashhad, Sari, Isfahan, Shiraz and Khuzestan, respectively. A comparison between these data was made with similar periodic to the year before the pandemic. The data required for atmospheric monitoring were gained from the NASA database between February 19 and June 1, 2019, as well as from February 19 to June 1, 2020, and were analyzed in Python, MATLAB, and MINITAB softwares. The results of statistical analysis showed that the average levels of pollution in 2019 were significantly different between large cities and between wildlife refuges, while in 2020 there was no significant difference. Also, results showed that covid-19 had a significant effect on reducing the amount of nitrogen dioxide in Sari and Miankaleh wildlife refuge. The amount of this pollutant for Shadegan and Ahvaz city in 2020 was less than 2019, but it was not much different for Shadegan. The social restrictions have had a significant reduction on the levels of nitrogen dioxide in Mashhad, so that the amount of this pollutant has decreased by an average of 44% during the three-month period, but due to lack of information in The Heydari Shelter cannot be judged for the entire three-month period. Nitrogen dioxide in the Bakhtegan has not been changed significantly in the three month of 2019 and 2020. Although in Shiraz until April 13, along with April 15, the amount of nitrogen dioxide due to covid-19 decreased significantly, but from April 13 onwards, the amount of this pollutant has been higher than in the previous year. Further studies will be need to identify the restrictive effects of Covid-19 pandemic on the status of other atmospheric pollutants in Iranian wildlife refuges.

Keywords

References

  1. Anonymous, 1987. Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska. U.S. Government Printing Office. pp: 135-155.
  2. Atkinson, R.W.; Butland, B.K.; Anderson, H.R. and Maynard, R.L., 2018. Long‐term concentrations of nitrogen dioxide and mortality: A meta‐analysis of cohort studies. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.). Vol. 29, No. 4, pp: 460-472.
  3. Sherwood, B.; Cutler, D. and Burton, J.A., 2002. Wildlife and roads: the ecological impact. The Ecological Impact. Imperial College Press, London, England. pp: 118-124.
  4. Bauwens, M.; Compernolle, S.; Stavrakou, T.; Müller, J.F.; Van-Gent, J.; Eskes, H.; Levelt, P.F.; Van-Der, R.; Veefkind, A.J.P.; Vlietinck, J.; Yu, H. and Zehner, 
    C., 2020.     Impact of Coronavirus Outbreak on NO2 Pollution Assessed Using TROPOMI and OMI Observations. Geophysical Research Letters. Vol. 47, No. 11, pp: 1-16.
  5. Beirle, S.; Platt, U.; Wenig, M. and Wagner, T., 2003. Weekly cycle of NO2 by GOME measurements: A signature of anthropogenic sources. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Vol. 3, No. 6, pp: 2225-2232.
  6. De Boor, G., 2004. Spline Toolbox (7th ed.). The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA.
  7. De-Foy, B.; Lu, Z. and Streets, D.G., 2016. Satellite NO2 retrievals suggest China has exceeded its NOx reduction goals from the twelfth five‐year plan. Scientific Reports. Vol. 6, No. 1, pp: 35-912.
  8. Duncan, B.N.; Lamsal, L.N.; Thompson, A.M.; Yoshida, Y.; Lu, Z.; Streets, D.G.; Hurwitz, M.M. and Pickering, K.E., 2016. A space‐based, high‐resolution view of notable changes in urban NOx pollution around the world 
    (2005‐2014). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. Vol. 121, pp: 976-996.
  9. Gadsdon, S.R. and Power, S.A., 2009. Quantifying local traffic contributions to NO2 and NH3 concentrations in natural habitats. Environmental Pollution. Vol. 157, No. 10, pp: 2845-2852.
  10. Gautam, S., 2020. COVID-19: air pollution remains low as people stay at home. Air Quality, Atmosphere, & Health, p.1.
  11. Griffiths, J. and Woodyatt, A., 2020. Wuhan coronavirus: Thousands of cases confirmed as China goes into emergency mode. CNN. Available from edition CNN.com/2020/01/26/ asia/wuhancoronavirus‐update‐intl‐hnk/index.html.
  12. Horowitz, J., 2020. Italy locks down much of the country's north over the coronavirus. The New York Times Retrieved from nytimes.com/2020/03/07/world/Europe/coro‐navirus italy.html, Accessed 25 April 2020.
  13. Kaplan, G. and Avdan Z.Y., 2020. Short report covid-19: Spaceborne nitrogen dioxide over turkey. Eskişehir technical university journal of science and technology A applied sciences and engineering. Vol. 21, No. 2, pp: 251-255.
  14. Leggett, T., 2020. Coronavirus: Global growth ‘could halve’ if outbreak intensifies. BBC. Retrieved bbc.com/news/ business‐51700935, Accessed 25 April 2020.
  15. Newman, J.R.; Schreiber, R.K. and Novakova, E., 1992. Air Pollution Effects on Terrestrial and Aquatic Animals. Air Pollution Effects on Biodiversity. pp: 177-233.
  16. Tan, P.H.; Chou, C.; Liang, J.Y.; Chou, C.K. and Shiu, C.J., 2009. Air pollution ‘holiday effect’ resulting from the Chinese New Year. Atmospheric Environment. Vol. 43,  No. 13, pp: 2114-2124.
  17. Turner, P.R., 2001. Guide to scientific computing. CRC press.
Journal of Animal Environment
Volume 12, Issue 3
June 2020
Pages 449-456

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics