Trends of Changes in Waterbird Biodiversity Indices of the Bakhtegan Basin Wetlands Using Semi-wintering Census: 1988-2018

Document Type : Biodiversity

Authors

1 Research Group of Biodiversity and Biosafety, Research Center for Environment and Sustainable Development (RCESD), Department of Environment, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Science, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran

3 Fars Provincial Office of Environment, Shiraz, Iran

4 Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Environmental Sciences Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Bakhtegan wetland including Kamjan, Tashk and Bakhtegan are the most important aquatic habitats of waterbirds in the inland of Iran that in recent years, the severe decline in water level and habitat changes have reduced the quality and quantity of habitat for waterbirds. In this study, the trends of biodiversity changes are studied based on the values of waterbird species diversity indices (Shannon-Wiener & Simpson), Species richness indices (Margalef & Minhinick) and species evenness indices (Pielou & Simpson) using the SDR-IV software in the 31 years' period (2018-1998) including two ten-years and one 11-years' time frames.Moreover, the area of alive wetland in the migration season of waterbirds by calculated using the Landsat satellite imagery collected on November to December. Comparison of diversity indices using ANOVA (analysis of variance) at three time intervals showed that there is no significant difference between species diversity indices and Pielou species evenness index (F2,28 = Shannon-Wiener 2.082, Simpson 0.995, Pielou 2.132, P>0.05). The lowest values of the Margalef index were found in the period of 2009–2009 that were significantly different with other previous decade but there was no significantly differences with periods of 1988–1998. The highest value of the richness index of Minhinick and Simpson E were found in the periods of 2009–2019 and were significantly different with previous decades (p < 0.05). The highest of area of alive wetland in the 1990s and the lowest was in 2001 and in the last decade. It seems that fluctuation of water level and decreasing the alive area of Bakhtegan basin wetlands are the most important factors in the changing the values of waterbird diversity. Providing the environmental flow requirement, implementation of comprehensive wetland management programs and establishment of integrated ecosystem management system are the most important strategies for restoring the waterbird biodiversity of the studied wetlands.

Keywords

References

  1. Amat, J.A. and Green, A.J., 2010. Waterbirds as Bioindicators of environmental conditions, in: Hurford, C.; Scheider, M. and Cowx, I., (Eds.). Conservation Monitoring in freshwater habitats. A practical guide and case studies. The Netherlands. Springer. pp: 45-52.
  2. Butchart, S.H.M.; Walpole, M.; Collen B.; Van Strien, A.; Scharlemann, J.P.W. and Watson, R., 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science. Vol. 328, pp: 1164-1168.
  3. Delany, S. and Scott, D., 2006. Waterbird Population Estimates Fourth Edition, 2006: Wetlands International. Wageningen, The Netherland.
  4. Ghasemi, S. and Zakaria, M., 2011. Relative abundance and diversity of waterbirds in Rhizophora Mangrove Forest in Iran. Asia Life Science. Vol. 20, No. 1, pp: 210-238.
  5. Goudarzian, P. and Erfanifard, S.Y., 2017. The efficiency of indices of richness, evenness and biodiversity in the investigation of species diversity changes (case study: migratory water birds of Parishan international wetland, Fars province, Iran). Biodiversity International Journal. Vol. 1, No. 2, pp: 41-45.
  6. Hurlbert, S.H., 1971. The non-concept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology. Vol. 52, pp: 577-586.
  7. Krebs, C.J., 1994. Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
  8. Lantz, S.; Gawlik, D.E. and Cook, M.I., 2011. The Effects of Water Depth and Emergent Vegetation on Foraging Success and Habitat Selection of Wading Birds in the Everglades. Waterbirds. Vol. 34, No. 4, pp: 439-447.
  9. Legras, G.; Loiseau, N.; Gaertner, J.C.; Poggiale, J.C.; Ienco, D.; Mazouni, N. and Mérigot, B., 2019. Assessment of congruence between co-occurrence and functional networks: A new framework for revealing community assembly rules. Scientific Reports. Vol. 9, No. 1, pp: 1-10.
  10. Lioyd, M. and Ghelardi, R.J., 1964. A table for calculating the `equitability' component of species diversity. Journal of Animal Ecology. Vol. 33, No. 2, pp: 217-225.
  11. Magurran, A.E., 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  12. Magurran, A.E., 1998. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  13. Martinez‐Almoyna, C.; Thuiller, W.; Chalmandrier, L.; Ohlmann, M.; Foulquier, A.; Clément, J.C. and Münkemüller, T., 2019. Multi‐trophic β‐diversity mediates the effect of environmental gradients on the turnover of multiple ecosystem functions. Functional Ecology. Vol. 33, No. 10, pp: 2053-2064.
  14. McDonald, C.; Smith, R.; Scott, M. and Dick, J., 2010. Using indices to measure biodiversity change through time. METMAV International Workshop on spatiotemporal modelling, University Santiago de Compostela.
  15. Musilova´, Z.; Musil, P.; Pola´kova´, S. and Fuchs, R., 2009. Wintering ducks in the Czech Republic: changes in their population trends and distribution. Wildfowl Special. Vol. 2, pp: 73-85.
  16. Newton, A.C., 2007. Forest Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques, New York: Oxford University Press.
  17. Nilsson, L., 2008. Changes in numbers and distribution of wintering waterfowl in Sweden during forty years, 1967-2006. Ornis Svecica. Vol. 18, pp: 135-236.
  18. Ohlmann, M.; Miele, V.; Dray, S.; Chalmandrier, L.; O’Connor, L. and Thuiller, W., 2019. Diversity indices for ecological networks: a unifying framework using Hill numbers. Ecology Letters. pp: 1-11.
  19. Pielou, E.C., 1975. Ecological Diversity. New York, Wiley Inter Science.
  20. Schreiber, E. and Burger, J., 2002. Biology of marine birds, Boca Raton. USA: Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press.
  21. Scott, D.A., 2010. Results of Mid-winter Waterbird Counts in Iran in the Early 1970s. Podoces. Vol. 5, No. 1, pp: 11-28.
  22. Seaby, R.M. and Henderson, P.A., 2006. Species Diversity and Richness version 4. Pisces Conservation Ltd., Lymington, England.
  23. Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W., 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illions Press, Urbana, USA. pp: 1-117.
  24. Simpson, E.H., 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature. Vol. 163, pp: 688.
  25. Stolen, E.D.; Breininger, D.R. and Frederick, P.C., 2005. Using waterbirds as indicators in estuarine systems: successes and perils, in: Bortone, S.A., (Ed.). Estuarine Indicators. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. pp: 409-422.
  26. Tuomisto, H., 2010. A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Yes, it does exist. Oecologia. Vol. 164, No. 4, pp: 853-860.
  27. Van Strien, A.J.; Gmelig Meyling, A.W.; Herder, J.E.; Hollander, H.; Kalkman, V.J. and Turnhout, S., 2016. Modest recovery of biodiversity in a western European country: The Living Planet Index for the Netherlands. Biol. Conserv. Vol. 200, pp: 44-50.
  28. Wetlands International. 2015. Report on the Conservation Status of Migratory Waterbirds in the Agreement Area - Sixth Edition (CSR6), UNEP/AEWA/MOP6.14. UNEP/AEWA, Bonn, Germany.
  29. Whittaker, R.H., 1977. Evolution of species diversity in land communities. Evolutionary Biology. Vol. 10, pp: 1-67.
  30. Whittaker, R.J.; Willis, K.J. and Field, R., 2001. Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography. Vol. 28, No. 4, pp: 453-470.
Journal of Animal Environment
Volume 12, Issue 4
December 2020
Pages 187-198

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics