Evaluation of the effect of mulberry tree cultivation mixture compared to its single cultivation mode on the performance of silkworm economic traits (Bombyx mori L)

Document Type : (original research)

Authors

Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Science, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate the effects of mulberry mixture cultivation compared to single mulberry cultivation mode on the biological performance of silkworm. In this experiment, a mixture of mung bean, bean, fodder corn, pumpkin stew and horseradish was used among the rows of berries, and in a single ship, special berries were used. In order to evaluate the quality of the leaves produced after the cultivation of the mentioned plants, the leaves were used in silkworm feeding. The study was conducted in a completely randomized design with three replications per treatment. Each replicate consisted of one hundred and fifty-one-day-old larvae of the 154×153 commercial hybrids. The larvae were bred according to the standard methods of the Iran Silk Research Center (ISRC). The results showed that the total number of cocoons, the number of good cocoons, the total weight of the cocoons, the weight of the good cocoon and the weight of one female and male cocoon in the berry-bean treatment had the highest value compared to the single treatment of mulberry (P<0.05). Also, the number of alive good cocoons in the berry-bean treatment was significantly higher than other treatments (P<0.05). In general, the results showed that the type of plant planted with the mulberry tree had a significant positive effect on most traits of silkworms compared to single planting.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Agegnehu, G.; Ghizaw, A. and Sinebo, W., 2006. Yield Performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. European Journal of Agronomy. Vol. 25, No. 3, pp: 202-207.
  2. Ahmad, A.H.; Ahmad, R.; Mahmood, N. and Nazir, M.S., 2006. Competitive performance of associated forage crops grown in different forage sorghum-legume intercropping systems. Pakistan Journal Agriculture Science. Vol. 43, pp: 25-31.
  3. Awal, M.A.; Koshi, H. and Ikeda, T., 2006. Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Vol. 139, pp: 74-83.
  4. Banik, P.; Midya, A.; Sarkar, B.K. and Ghose, S.S., 2006. Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in and additive series experimentsts: Advantages and weed additive series experiment: Advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy. 24, pp: 325-332.
  5. Geren, H.; Avcioglo, R.; Soya, H. and Kir, B., 2008. Intercropping of corn with cowpea and bean: Biomass yield and silage quality. African Biotechnology. Vol. 7, pp: 4100-4104.
  6. Hao, Y.; Wan Hong, I.; Jingling, Y.; Bo, S.; Xin Qin, S. and Gang, L., 2010. Effects of nitrogen amount and nitrogen form on 1deoxynojimycin content in mulberry leaf. Hunan Agricultural Science and Technology. Vol. 11, No. 6, pp: 183-185.
  7. Karadag, Y. and Buyukburc, U., 2003. Effects of seed rates of forage production, seed yield and hay quality of annual legume-barley mixture. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. Vol. 27, pp: 169-174.
  8. Koul, A.; Gupta, A.; Singh, D. and Gupta, S.P., 1996. Intercropping of vegetables in mulberry. Journal of Sericulture. Vol. 4, No. 20, pp: 48-51.
  9. Neumann, A.; Schmidtke, K. and Rauber, R., 2007. Effects of crop density and tillage system on grain yield and N uptake from soil and atmosphere of sole and intercrop epee and oat. Field Crops Research. Vol. 100, pp: 285-293.
  10. Noulas, C.; Stamp, P.; Soldati, A. and Liedgens, M., 2004. Nitrogen use efficiency of spring wheat genotypes under field and lysimeter conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. Vol. 190, pp: 111-118.
  11. Shanker, M.A. and Shivashanker, K., 1994. Effect of sources of nitrogen on filament length, cocoon yield and silk quality. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences. Vol. 28, pp: 157-164.
  12.  SPSS.1997. SPSS Base 7.5 for Windows. SPSS, Chicago, IL.
  13. Zulfigar, A.; Asghar Malik, M. and Cheema, M.A., 2000. Studies on determining a suitable canola–wheat intercropping. Agriculture Biology. Vol. 2, No, 1, pp: 42-44.