Abundance and structure of phytoplankton in Lake Chitgar during 2017-19 and comparison with previous studies

Document Type : (original research)

Authors

Inland Waters Aquaculture Research Center, Iranian Fisheries Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Bandar Anzali, Iran

Abstract

This study focused on phytoplankton structure and compared with previously study at the 5 stations between 2017 and 2019 in the Chitgar Lake. This study identified 37 phytoplankton taxa comprised of Diatoms (12 genus), Chlorophyta (10 genus), Cyanophyta (8 genus), dinoflagellates (3 genus), chrysophytes (1 genus) and Euglenophyta (3 genus) in the lake. The finding showed, the Diatom abundance dominate (average of 8700000 ± 7900000 cells.l-1) in the lake. The annual average phytoplankton abundance was calculated as 13400000, with the maximum value recorded in March 2018 (23000000 ± 8500000 cell. l-1). The results showed that the abundance of phytoplankton increased (more than 5-fold). Chlorophyll a, 0.5 μg / L was recorded in this study, which was 5 times more than in 2013-14. Phacus, Trachelomonas and Euglena genera from Euglenophyta phylum were first observed in lake, the presence of Euglenophyta indicating increased lake contamination trend. The abundance and species diversity of green-blue algae decreased after release of silver carp in the lake in June 2019. The abundance of Oscillatoria increased from 800,000 cell. l-1 in September 2018 to 200,000 cell. l-1 in June 2019. The decrease in cyanophyta abundance has prevented the unpleasant odor and prevented the increase of insects in the environment around the lake, preventing aquatic mortality and increasing trend of tourists.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. APHA.  2005. Standard method for the examination of water and wastewater. Washigton, DC, USA. 1265 p.
  2. Bagheri, S.; Mashhor, M.; Makaremi, M.; Mirzajani, A.; Babaei, H.; Negarestan, H. and Wan-Maznah, W.O., 2010. Distribution and composition of phytoplankton in the south-western Caspian Sea during 2001-2002, a comparison with previous surveys. World Journal of Fish and Marine Sciences. Vol. 2, pp: 416-426.
  3. Bagheri, S.; Mansor, M.; Makaremi, M.; Sabkara, J.; Wan-Maznah, W.O.; Mirzajani, A.; Khodaparast, S.H.; Ghandi, A. and Khalilpour, A., 2011. Fluctuations of phytoplankton community in the coastal waters of Caspian Sea in 2006. American Journal of Applied Sciences. Vol. 8, pp: 1328-1336. doi:10.3844/ajassp.
  4. Bagheri, S., 2012. Ecological assessment of plankton and effect of alien species in the south-western Caspian Sea. PhD thesis. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
  5. Bagheri, S.; Mansor, M.; Turkoglu, M.; Makaremi, M.; Wan Omar, W.O. and Negarestan, H., 2012a. Phytoplankton species composition and abundance in the southwestern Caspian Sea. Ekoloji. Vol. 21, pp: 32-43. doi: 10.5053/ekoloji.2012.834
  6. Bagheri, S.; Niermann, U.; Sabkara, J.; Mirzajani, A. and Babaei, H., 2012b. State of Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora: Lobata) and mesozooplankton in Iranian waters of the Caspian Sea during 2008 in comparison with previous surveys. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences. Vol. 11, pp: 732-754.
  7. Bagheri, S.; Mansor, M.; Turkoglu, M.; Wan Maznah, W.O. and Babaei, H., 2013. Temporal distribution of phytoplankton in the southwestern Caspian Sea during 2009-2010: A comparison with previous surveys. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Vol. 92, pp: 1243-1255.
  8. Bertoni, R., 2011. Limnology of rivers and lakes. Institute of Ecosystem Study, ISE-CNR, Verbania, Italy, UNESCO-EOLSS. 68 p.
  9. Boney, A.D., 1989. Edward annoid. British Library Cataloguing Publication data. 118 p.
  10. Boyd, P.W., 2007. Mesoscale iron enrichment experiments 1993-2005: Synthesis and future directions. Science. Vol. 315, pp: 612-617. doi: 10.1126/science.1131669
  11. Kideys, A.E.; Soydemir, N.; Eker, E.; Vladymyrov, ; Soloviev, D. and Melin, F., 2005. Phytoplankton distribution in the Caspian Sea during March 2001. Hydrobiologia. Vol. 543, pp: 159-168. doi: 10.1007/s10750-004-6953-x
  12. Li, S. and Mathias, J., 1994. Freshwater Fish Culture in China: Principles and Practice, Volume 28, 1st Edition, U.S, Elsevier Science. 445 p. ISBN: 9780444888822.
  13. Menezes, R.F.; Attayde, J.L. and Vasconcelos, F.R., 2010. Effects of omnivorous filter-feeding fish and nutrient enrichment on the plankton community and water transparency of a tropical reservoir. Freshwater Biology. Vol. 55, pp: 767-779.
  14. Newell, G.E. and Newell, R.C., 1977. Marine plankton a practical guide. 5th Edn., Hutchinson, London. 244 p.
  15. Palmer, C.M., 1977. Algae and Water Pollution. Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development, USEPA   EPA/600/9-77-036.
  16. Resende, P.; Azeiteiro, U.M.; Goncalves, F. and Pereira, M.J., 2007. Distribution and ecological preferences of diatoms and dinoflagellata in the west Iberian coastal zone (North Portugal). Acta Oecologica. Vol. 32, pp: 224-235. doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2007.05.004
  17. Richardson, A.J., 2008. In hot water: zooplankton and climate change ICES J. Marine Science. Vol. 65, pp:
    279-295. doi: org/10.1093/icesjms/fsn028.
  18. Sourina, A., 1978. Phytoplankton manual, United nations educational, Scientific and Culture Organization. Paris. 337 p.
  19. Thorp, J.H. and Covich, A.P., 2001. Ecology and classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition-Academic Press. 1056 p.
  20. Torres, S.G.; Silva, S.H.; Rangel, M.L. and Attayde, L.J., 2015. Cyanobacteria are controlled by omnivorous filter-feeding fish (Nile tilapia) in a tropical eutrophic reservoir. Hydrobiologia. Vol. 16, pp: 1-15.
  21. Turkoglu, M., 2008. Synchronous blooms of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (Lohmann) Hay & Mohler and three dinoflagellata in the Dardanelles (Turkish Straits System). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Vol. 88, pp: 433-441.
  22. Winder, M.; Reuter, J.E. and Schladow, S.G., 2009. Lake warming favours small-sized planktonic diatom species. Proceedings of the Royal Society. Vol. 276, pp: 427-435. doi: 1098/rspb.2008.1200.