Evaluation of Ecotourism Prone Zones in the Eshkevarat No-Hunting area

Document Type : (original research)

Authors

1 Department of Planning and Design of the Environment, Environmental Science Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assessment and Environment Risks Department, Research Center of Environment and Sustainable Development and College of Environment, Karaj, Iran

3 Department of Economics, Education and Policy, Environmental Sciences Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Tourism in protected areas as a mechanism for financial self-government is a support for conservation and a tool for facilitating management. Therefore, tourism in these regions in order to preserve biodiversity and genetic reserves should be achieved based on ecological potential assessment in susceptible areas so that no damage to biological species is done. The aim of this study was to evaluate the susceptible areas of ecotourism using two methods of multi-criteria evaluation and system analysis. For this purpose, 19 options were selected in 7 clusters and each layer was combined using Analysis Network Process (ANP) method to determine the power of the options using Weighted Linear Composition (WLC). The results of multi-criteria evaluation method showed that 18.98% in the Class 1, 2.15% in the Class 2, 15.87% in the Class 3, and about 63% in the Class 4. The results of the system analysis also showed that 19.71% in the Class 1, 2.03% Class 2, 11.41% Class 3, and about 61.70% Class 4. The results of both methods are similar and indicate that due to the conservation status, the existence of endangered animal and plant species, as well as considering the ecological nest of animal species, high elevation and slope in the area, the largest in the protected and safe zones, are some of the reasons, that limits access for visitors to the Eshkevarat No-Hunting area.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. abaie-Kafaky, S.; Mataji, A. and Ahmadi Sani, N., 2009. Ecological capability assessment for multiple-use in forest areas using GIS- based multiple criteria decision-making approach. American Journal of Environmental Sciences. Vol. 5, No. 6, pp: 714-721.
  2. Bunruamkaew, K. and Murayama, Y., 2011. Site Suitability Evaluation for Ecotourism Using GIS & AHP: A Case Study of Surat Thani Province, Thailand. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 21, pp: 269-278.
  3. Canteiroa, M.; Córdova-Tapiab, F. and Brazeiroc, A., 2018. Tourism impact assessment: A tool to evaluate the environmental impacts of touristic activities in Natural Protected Areas, Tourism Management Perspectives. Vol. 28, pp: 220-227.
  4. Chen, Y.Ch.; Lien, H.P. and Tzeng, G.H., 2010. Measures and evaluation for environment watershed plans using a novel hybrid MCDM model. Expert Systems with Applications. Vol. 37, pp: 926-938.
  5. Chung, S.H.; Lee, A.H.L. and Pearn, W.L., 2005. Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 96, pp: 15-36.
  6. Cochrane, J., 2006. Indonesian national parks understanding leisure users. Annals of Tourism Research. Vol. 4, No. 33, pp: 979-997.
  7. Danekar, A. and Haddadinia, S., 2009. Weighting and Ranking criteria for Istanbul Metropolitan Area, Advances in Engineering Softwarem. Vol. 40, pp: 128-140.
  8. Farrell, T.A. and Marion, J.L., 2002. Identifying and Assessing Ecotourism Visitor Impacts at Eight Protected Areas in Costa Rica and Belize. Environmental Conservation Journal. Vol. 28, No. 3, pp: 215-225.
  9. Garcia-Herrera, J.J., 2012. Handbook of ecotourism in protected areas of Vietnam. FUNDESO. Ecotourism in Protected Areas of Vietnam.
  10. Ghorbani, A., 2015. Ecotourism sustainable development strategies using SWOT and QSPM model: A case study of Kaji Namakzar Wetland, South Khorasan Province Iran. Tourism Management Perspectives. Vol. 16, pp: 297-290.
  11. Gul, A.M.; Orucu, K. and Oznur, K., 2006. An approach for recreation suitability analysis to recreation planning in Golchuk Nature Journal of environmental management. Vol. 1, pp: 606-625.
  12. Gyan, P.; Duarte, N.; Morais, B. and Graefe, R., 2004. Nature tourism constraints, A Cross activity comparison. Annals of Tourism Research. Vol. 31, No. 3, pp: 540-555.
  13. Habtemariama, B.T. and Fanga, O., 2016. Zoning for a multiple use marine protected area using spatial multi criteria analysis: The case of the Sheik Seid Marine National Park in Eritrea. Marine Vol. 63, pp: 135-143.
  14. Hajehforooshnia, Sh.; Soffianian, A.; Mahiny, A.S. and Fakheran, S., 2011. Multi objective land allocation (MOLA) for zoning Ghamishloo Wildlife Sanctuary in Iran. Journal for Nature Conservation. Vol. 19, pp: 254-262.
  15. Jozi, S.A.; Zaredar, N. and Rezaeian, S., 2010. Evaluation of ecological capability using spatial multi criteria evaluation method (SMCE) (Case study: implementation of indoor recreation in Varjin protected Area Iran). International Journal of Environmental Science and Development Vol. 3, No. 1, pp: 273-277.
  16. Kangas, J.; Kangas, A.; Leskinen, P. and Pykalainen, J., 2001. MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on state-owned lands in Finland. Journal Multi Criteria Dec Anal. Vol. 10, pp: 41-57.
  17. Karami, O., 2010. Land use evaluation applied to forestry, reforestation and ecotourism by systemic analysis and AHP methods (Case Study: Babolrood Basin). M.Sc. Thesis, Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 114 p. (In Persian)
  18. Karami, A. and Feghhi, J., 2012. Investigation of Quantitative metrics to protect the landscape in land use by sustainable pattern (Case study: Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad), Journal of Environmental Studies. Vol. 37, No.60, pp: 79-88. (In Persian).
  19. Kumari, S.; Behera, M.D. and Tewari, H.R., 2010. Identification of potential ecotourism sites in West District, Sikkim using geospatial tools. Tropical Ecology. Vol. 51. No. 1, pp: 75-85.
  20. Laurance, W.; Alonso, M. and Campbell, M., 2005. Challeng for forest conservation in Gabon. Central Africa. Futures. Vol. 38, pp: 454-474.
  21. Liaghata, M.; Shahabi, H.; Rokni Deilami, R.; Sattari Ardabili, F.; Navid Seyedi, S. and badri, H., 2013. A Multi-Criteria Evaluation using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Technique to Analyze Coastal Tourism Sites. APCBEE Procedia. Vol. 19- 20, pp: 479-485.
  22. Lin, L.Z. and Lu, C.F., 2013. Fuzzy Group Decision-Making in the Measurement of Ecotourism Sustainability Potential. Group Decis Negot. Vol. 22. pp: 1051-1079.
  23. Makhdom, M., 2010. Principles of land use. University of Tehran. 289 p. (In Persian).
  24. Malczewski, , 2004. GIS-based landuse suitability analysis: a critical overview. Journal of Progress in Planning. 62 p.
  25. Najafi, A., 2010. Structure and environmental challenges analysis in projects management using analytical. International journal of industry and production management engineering. Vol. 1, No. 21, pp: 63-76. (In Persian)
  26. Nino, K.; Mamo, Y.; Mengesha, G. and Kibret, K.S., 2017. GIS based ecotourism potential assessment in Munessa Shashemene concession forest and its surrounding area, Ethiopia. Applied Geography. Vol. 82, pp: 48-58.
  27. Pananjay, G.B.G.; Tiwari, K.; Shashi, G.B.G.; Tiwari, K. and Tiwari, S.C., 2011. An overview of potential ecotourism resources and their prospects in Valley of Flowers National Park, Uttaranchal, India. Caspian J. Env. Sci. Vol. 9, No.1, pp: 105-110.
  28. Phillips, P. and Moutinho, L., 2014. Critical review of strategic planning research inhospitality and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 48, pp: 120-96.
  29. Pourebrahim, Sh.; M. Hadipour, M.; Bin Mokhtar, M.I. and Mohamed, H.J., 2010. Analytic network process for criteria selection in sustainable coastal land use planning. Ocean and Coastal Management. Vol. 53, pp: 544-551.
  30. Razmi, J.; Amalnik, M.S. and Hashemi, M., 2008. Selection of supplier by fuzzy analytical network process. Journal of Technical Faculty. Vol. 7, No. 42, pp: 935-946 (In Persian).
  31. Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytical hierarchy process, planning priority. Resource Allocation. RWS Publication, USA. 287 p.
  32. Salehi, R.; Nemati, M. and Amanpour, S., 2014. A Study on the mechanism of influencing social capital indicators in a desirable urban goverance using Amos. Case study: Nasim Shahr City. Journal of Spatial Planing (Geograpy). Vol. 4, No. 1, pp: 2-24. (In Persian)
  33. Somarriba-Chang M.A. and Gunnarsdotter, Y., 2012. Local community participation in ecotourism and conservation issues in two nature reserves in Nicaragua. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Vol. 15, pp: 1-19.
  34. Tuzkaya, G.; Onut, S.; Tuzkaya, U.R. and Gulsun, B., 2008. An analytic network process approach for locating undesirable facilities: an example from Istanbul, Turkey. Journal of environmental management. Vol. 88, pp: 970-983.
  35. Williams, P.W., 1992. A local framework for ecotourism development. Western Wildlands. Vol. 3, No. 18, pp: 14-19.
  36. Yuksel, I. and Dagdeviren, M., 2007. Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis-a case study for a textile firm. Information sciences. 177, pp: 3364- 3382.