Effect of prebiotic Imonoval on reproduction and growth factors in ornamental fish molly (Poecilia butleri)

Document Type : Nutrition

Authors

Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Fisheries and Environment, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, PO Box: 487-49175

Abstract

Prebiotics are non-digestible ingredients that by stimulating the growth and activity of bacteria in the intestines have beneficial effects for the host. However, few studies on the effect of prebiotics on reproduction and growth factors in ornamental fish were done. In this experiment, the fish was 20 weeks old. Tests carried out in the form of 4 treatments and 3 repetitions. Four diets, including treatment 1 (control), 2, 3 and 4 respectively containing 0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5 percent Imonoval was prepared. Fish were fed 3 times daily for 5 percent of body weight for 26 weeks. Results showed that the final weight and length were not significantly different in different groups. Relative fecundity, gonadosomatic index, length and weight of larvae were significantly lower in control group compared to group 3 and 4 (P<0.01). Results also showed that Imonoval has no effect on sex ratios. In this experiment, according to the results of the growth and reproductive factors, dietary 4 showed better performance than other treatments. In general, the use of prebiotic Imonoval in Mollies fish diet is recommended.

Keywords


  1. Andrews., C., 2006. The ornamental fish trade and fish conservation. Journal of Fish Biology. Vol. 37, pp: 53-59.
  2. AOAC.1990. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC,
    Vol. 1,15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
  3. Chapman, F.A.; Fitz-coy, S.A.; Thunberg, E.M. and Adams, C.M., 2007. United States of America Trade in Ornamental Fish. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. Vol. 28, No. 1, pp: 1-10.
  4. Chong, A.; Hashim, R. and Ali, A., 2003. Assessment of soybean meal in diets for discus (Symphysodonaequifasciata HECKEL) farming through a fishmeal replacement study. Aquacult Research. Vol. 34, pp: 913-922.
  5. Chong, A.S.C.; Ishak, S.D. and Osman, Z.R., 2004. Hashim. Effect of dietary protein level on the reproductive performance of female swordtails Xiphophorus helleri (Poeciliidae). Aquaculture. Vol. 234, pp: 381-392.
  6. Dahlgren, B.T., 1980. The effects of three different dietary protein levels on the fecundity in the guppy, Poecilia reticulate (Peters). Journal of Fish Biology. Vol. 16,
    pp: 83-97.
  7. De Schrijver, R. and Ollevier, F., 2000. Protein digestion in juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and effects of dietary administration of Vibrio proteolyticus. Aquaculture. Vol. 186, pp: 107-116.
  8. Fooks, L.J.; Fuller, R. and Gibson, G.R., 1999. Prebioticts, Probiotics and human gut microbiology. International Dairy Journal. Vol. 9, pp: 53-61.
  9. Ghosh, S.; Sinha, A. and Sahu, C., 2007. Effect of probiotic on reproductive performance in female livebearing ornamental fish. Aquaculture Research. Vol. 38, pp: 518-526.
  10. Gibson, G.R. and Roberfroid, M.B., 1995. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. Journal of Nutrition. Vol. 125,
    pp: 1401-1412.
  11. Irianto, A. and Austin, B., 2002. Use of probiotics to control furunculosis in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). Journal of Fish Disease. Vol. 25, pp: 1-10.
  12. Ling, S.; Hashim, R.; Kolkovski, S. and Shu-Chien,
    A.C.,
    2006. Effect of varying dietary lipid and protein levels on growth and reproductive performance of female swordtails Xiphophorus helleri (Poeciliidae). Aquaculture Research. Vol. 37, pp: 1267-1275.
  13. Peng, L.; Delbert, M. and Gatlin, III., 2004. Dietary brewers yeast and the prebiotic Grobiotick TM AE influence growth performance, immune responses and resistance of hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops×M. saxatilis) to Streptococcus iniae infection. Aquaculture. Vol. 231,
    pp: 445-456.
  14. Tavolga, W.N., 1949. Embryonic development of the platyfish (Platypoecilus), the swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) and their hybrids. American museum of natural history.
    Vol. 94, No. 4, pp: 227-229.