Rapid Assessment for Biodiversity Threats in Jajrood Protected Complex Based on GIS and Multi Criteria Analysis

Document Type : Animal environment

Authors

Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In order to improve and maximize biodiversity due to time restrictions, finance resource limitations to protect all habitats, species, and also due to people increasing concerns about biodiversity decline, it’s required that before any protective action, basic programs, management programs, political decision making, a rapid assessment and priority assigned about habitats and species threat. This research aims to assess biodiversity threats in Jajrood protection complex, provide threatened status delineation as cellular-network in the area. In order to analyze  biodiversity threatened fast evaluation in Jajrood protected area, initially biodiversity’s threats rapid assessment criteria and sub-criteria identified through reviewing  various resources, then  sub-criteria presence in the area was studied and 47 biodiversity threaten Sub-criteria identified in two fields of ecology and social economy. Then the most important sub-criteria were selected through using TOPSIS method. Sub-criteria selected through quantification-based indices were studied in order to classify biodiversity threatened status in studied area.  Finally, biodiversity threatened status classified as cellular-network in Jajrood protected area in five critical classification: high threatened or endanger, mild threatened or vulnerable, low threatened or very low threatened. Based on the results, 39.46% of area was in critical zone, 59.83% in too much threaten, 0.12% in vulnerable zone and only 0.59% of whole area was placed in very low threaten zone. The results emphasis the efficiency of this model to be applied in protected area as a rapid assessment method.

Keywords


  1. Bagheri, Z.; Pourebrahim, Sh. and Kaboli, M., 2015. prioritizing biodiversity threats in Iran protected areas using TOPSIS method. J of Ecology and Environment. pp: 209-220.
  2. Baral, H.; Keenan, R.J.; Sharma, S.K.; Stork, N.E. and Kasel,S.,2014.Spatial assessment and mapping of biodiversity and conservation priorities in a heavily modified and fragmented production landscape in north centeral Victoria, Australia, Ecological Indicators. Vol. 36, pp: 552-562.
  3. Burgess, N.D.; Hales, J.D.; Riketts T.H. and Dinerstein, E., 2006. Factoring species, non species values and threats into biodiversity prioritization across the ecorgions of Africa and its islands. Biologi Conservation. Vol. 127, pp: 383-401.
  4. Connelly, J.W.; Knick, S.T.; Schroeder, M.A. and Stiver, S.J., 2004. Conservation assessment of Greater Sage grouse and sage brush habitats. Chapter 7, pp: 276-400.
  5. Ervin, J., 2003. Rapid Assessment of Protected Area Management Effectiveness in Four Countries. Bio Science. Vol. 53, pp: 833-841.
  6. Gardner, T.A.; Barlow, J.; Sodhi, N.S. and Peres, C.A., 2010. Amulti regional assessment of tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modofied world, Biological Conservation. Vol. 143, pp: 2293-2300.
  7. Ibisch, P.L.;Nowicki, C.; Gonzales, R.; Oberfrank, T.; Specht, C.; Araujo, N. and Minkowski, K., 1999. Identification of conservation priorities in the Bolivia Amazon Anew biological socioeconomic methodology using GIS, Deutscher Tropentage in Berlin.
  8. Ibisch, P.L.; Nowicki, C.; Muller, R. and Araujo, N., 2002, Methods for the assessment of habitat and species conservation status in data poor countries-case study of Pleurothallidinae of the Andean rain forests of Bolivia. Congress of Conservation of Biodiveersity in The Andes and Amazon. pp: 255-246.
  9. Rouget, M.; Richardson, D.M.; Cowling, R.M.; Lloyd, J.W. and Lombard, A.T., 2003. Cuttent patterns of habitat transformation and future threats to biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biological Conservation. Vol.112, pp: 63-65.
  10. Rogres, H.M.; Glew, L.; Honzak, M. and Hudson, M.D.,2010, Prioritizing key biodiversity areas in Madagascar by including data on human pressure and ecosystem services. Journal of Landscape and Urbun planning. pp: 48-56.
  11. Shi, H.; Singh, A.; Kant, S.; Zhu, Z. and Waller, A.E., 2005, Integrating Habitat Status, Human Population Pressure and Protection Status inti Biodiversity Conservation Priority Setting, Conservation Biology. pp: 1273-1285.
  12. Thoisy, B.; Richard Hansen, C.; Goguillon, B.; Joubert, P.; Obstancias, J.; Winterton, P. and Brosse, S., 2010. Biodiversity Conservation. Vol. 19, pp: 1567-1589.
  13. Thorn, J.; Nijman, V.; Smith, D. and Nekaris, K.A., 2009. Ecological niche modeling as a technique for assessing threats and setting conservation priorities for Asian slow Lorise (Primates: Nycticebus), Diversity and Distributions, Vol.15, pp: 289-298.