Habitat suitability modelling of marbled teal (Marmaronetta anguistirostris) based on MaxEnt method

Document Type : Animal environment

Authors

Department of Environmental science, Faculty of marine natural science, Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology

Abstract

Recognizing the habitat requirements of wildlife species, especially endangered species, is of vital part of wildlife management. The purpose of this study was to habitat suitability modeling for vulnerable species of marbled teal (Marmaronetta angustirostris) in the northern part of Shadegan International Wetland. The presence of species was achieved by conducting field studies and reports from local communities and DOE experts. Environmental factors used as effective variables on presence include water depth, water temperature, electrical conductivity, acidity, soluble oxygen content, vegetation type, vegetation density index (NDVI) and distance from the village. Then, the variables needed for modeling were prepared using the GIS and finally, a Maximum Entropy Model (MaxEnt) was used to prepare the habitat suitability map. The results showed that the MaxEnt based on AUC had a good operation in this study (AUC = 0.981). Also EC, DO, Distance to village, vegetation type and depth was as important environmental variables respectively.

Keywords


  1. ALAbed, A.S.; Mudhafar, S. and Lujani Ibraheem, H., 2017. Distribution of the Marbled Teal Marmaronetta angustirostris over different habitat in Al Delmej Wetland Iraq. Advance Research Journal of Multi Disciplinary Discoveries. Vol. 11, pp: 10-13.
  2. Baldassarre, G.A. and Bolen, E.G., 2006. Waterfowl Ecology and Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York Publisher, Krieger Publishing Company. 567 p.
  3. Batt, B.D.J.; Afton, A.D.; Anderson, M.G.; Ankney, C.D.; Jonson, D.H.; Kadlec, J.A. and Krapu, G.L., 1992. Ecology and Management of Breeding Waterfowl. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis and London. 
  4. Behrouzi Rad, B., 2009. Waterbird Populations during Dry and Wet Years in the Hamoun Wetlands Complex, Iran/Afghanistan Border. Podoces. Vol. 4, No. 2, pp: 88-99.
  5. Benito, B.M.; Martnez Ortega, M.M.; Munoz, L.M.; Lorite, J. and Pears, J., 2009. Assessing extinction-risk of endangered plants using species distribution models: a case study of habitat depletion caused by the spread of greenhouses. Biodiversity and Conservation. Vol. 62, No. 9, pp: 2209-2220.
  6. Elith, J.; Graham, C.H.; Anderson, R.P.; Dudik, M.; Ferrier, S.; Guisan, A.; Hijmans, R.J.; Huettmann, F.; Leathwick, J.R.; Lehmann, A.; Li, J.; Lohmann, L.G.; Loiselle, B.A.; Manion, G.; Moritz, C.; Nakamura, M.; Nakazawa, Y.; Overton, J.M.; Peterson, A.T.; Phillips, S.J.; Richardson, K.; Scachetti Pereira, R.; Schapire, R.E.; Soberon, J.; Williams, S.; Wisz, M.S. and Zimmermann, N.E., 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species’distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. Vol. 29, pp: 129-151.
  7. Engler, R.; Guisan, A. and Rechsteiner, L., 2004. An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudoabsence data. Journal of Applied Ecology. Vol. 4, pp: 263- 274.
  8. Elmberg, J.; Nummi, P.; Poysa, H. and Sjoberg, K., 1993. Factors affecting species number and density of dabbling duck guilds in North Europe. Ecography. Vol. 16, pp: 251-260.
  9. Esther, S.G.; Cristina, F.; Jose, L.E. and Andy, j.G., 2012. Habitat selection of Marbled Teal and White-headed Duck during the breeding and wintering season in southeastern Spain.
  10. Fielding, A.H. and Bell, J.F., 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation. Vol. 24, pp: 38-49.
  11. Green, A.J., 1993.The status and conservation of the Marbled Teal (Marmaronetta angustirostris). Slimbridge U.K. Wetlands International, IWRB Spec. Publ. 23, 108 p.
  12. Groombridge, B., 1993. 1994 IUCN Red List of threatened animals. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, U.K.: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
  13. Green, A.J., 1998. Comparative feeding behavior and niche organization in a Mediterranean duck community. Canadian Journal of Zoology. Vol. 76, pp: 500-507.
  14. Green, A.J., 2000. The habitat requirements of the Marbled Teal (Marmaronetta angustirostris), Me´ne´tr., a review. In: Comı´n, F.A., Herrera, J.A., Ramı´rez, J. (Eds.) Limnology and aquatic birds monitoring, modelling and management. Proceedings of theSecond International Symposium on Limnology and Aquatic Birds. Universidad Auto´noma de Yucata´n, Me´rida. pp: 147-163.
  15. Gonzales, S.E.; Fuentes, C.; Ferrandez, M.; Jose, L.E. and Green, A.J., 2013. Habitat selection of Marbled Teal and White-headed Duck during the breeding and wintering seasons in south eastern Spain. Bird Conservation International. Vol. 23, No. 3, pp: 344-359.
  16. Hammer, H., 2012. Paleontological Statistics, Version 2104, Natural History Museum, University of Oslo. 411 p.
  17. Hattori, A. and Mae, S., 2001. Habitat Use and Diversity of Waterbirds in a Coastal Lagoon Biwa. Journal of Ecological Research. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp: 122-112.
  18. Hengel, T.; Sierdsema, H. and Radvic, A., 2009. Spatial prediction of species distributions from occurrence only record: combining point pattern analysis, ENFA and regression-kriging. Ecological Modeling, Vol. 220, No. 24, pp: 3499-3511.
  19. Hernandez, P.A.; Graham, C.H.; Master, L.L. andAlbert, D.L., 2016. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography. Vol. 29, No. 2, pp: 339-322.
  20. Hoyer, M.V. and Canfield, D.E., 1994. Bird abundance and species richness on Florida Lake: influence of trophic status, lake morphology, and aquatic macrophytes. Volume 279, No. 1, pp: 107-119.
  21. Ortega Huerta, M.A. and Peterson, A.T., 2118. Modeling ecological niches and predicting geographic distributions: a test of six presences only methods. Revista mexicana de Biodiversidad. Vol. 75, No. 6, pp: 205-216.
  22. Peterson, A.T.; Lash, R.R.; Carroll, D.S. and Johnson, K.M., 2006. Geographic potential for outbreaks of Marburg hemorrhagic fever. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Vol. 75, No. 1, pp: 9-15.
  23. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P. and Schapire, R.E., 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling. Vol. 190, pp: 231-259.
  24. Pillisson, J.M.; Reeber, S. and Marion, L., 2002. Bird Assemblages as Bio-indicators of Water Regime Management and Hunting Disturbance in Natural Wet Grasslands. Journal of Biologic Conservation. Vol. 106,
    pp: 115-127.
  25. Suter, W., 1994. Overwintering waterfowl on Swiss lake: how are abundance and species richness influenced by trophic status and lake morphology? Hydrobiologia. Vol. 279, No. 1, pp: 1-14.
  26. Titeux, N.; Dufrene, M.; Radoux, J.; Hirzel, A. and Defourny, P., 2001. Fitness-related parameters improve presence only distribution modelling for conservation practice: The case study of the red-backed shrike. Biological Conservation. Vol. 138, pp: 207-223.
  27. Vetaas, O.R., 2002. Realized and potential climate niches: a comparison of four Rhododendron tree species. J. Biogeogr. Vol.29, pp: 545-554.
  28. Wisz, M.S.; Hijmans, R.J.; Li, J.; Peterson, A.T.; Graham, C.H. and Guisan, A., 2008. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions. Vol. 14, No. 5, pp: 763-773.