Monitoring on Zarin Gol River health using SIGNAL index

Document Type : Biodiversity

Authors

Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Gonbad-e Kavos, POBox: 163

Abstract

Degradation of rivers and the associated loss of biodiversity reduces ecosystem health and water quality. One of the best practical approaches to understand ecological status of a water body and determine impacts of human activities in reducing water quality is the use of benthic macroinvertebrates as evaluation tools for monitoring their biological integrity and health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the health of Zarin Gol River using SIGNAL index. Macroinvertebrate samples were taken using Surber sampler (an area of 900 cm2) with 3 replicates in 4 sampling sites (upstream, entrance of fish farm, forest area) in winter and spring seasons on Zarin Gol River. The total number of abundance of macroinvertebrate were counted 1971 belonging to 8 order, 19 families. The result showed that SIGNAL index among all stations are same and lies in quadrant a. but SIGNAL 2 score result indicates that station 3 lies in quadrant b. In general, based on the results of the distribution of macroinvertebrates and biotic index, the influence of these factors on Zarin Gol river is quite evidence and the stations that were affected by a variety of effluents (2, 4) had undesirable conditions in the studied river.
 

Keywords


  1. Blanchet, H.; Lavesque, N.; Ruellet, T.; Dauvin, J.C.; Sauriau, P.G.; Desroy, N. and De Montaudouin, X., 2008. Use of biotic indices in semi-enclosed coastal ecosystems and transitional waters habitats implications for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 8, No. 4, pp: 360-372.
  2. Bode, R.W.; Novakk, M.A.; Abele, L.E.; Heitzman, D.L. and Smith, A.J., 2002. Quality assurance work plan for Biological stream monitoring in New York State. Stream Biomonitoring unit, New York State, Department of Environmental conservation. Albany. 122 p.
  3. Camargo, J.A.; Gonzalo, C. and Alonso, A., 2011. Assessing trout farm pollution by biological metrics and indices based on aquatic macrophytes and benthic macro invertebrates: a case study. Ecology Indicators. Vol. 11,
    pp: 911-917.
  4. Cooper, C.M., 1987. Benthos in Bear Creek, Mississippi: Effects of habitat variation and agricultural sediments. Journal of Freshwater Ecology. Vol. 4, pp: 101-113.
  5. Hynes, H.B.N., 1970. The ecology of running water. University of Toronto Press, Canada. 555 p.
  6. Schultz, R. and Dibble, E., 2012. Effects of invasive macrophytes on freshwater fish and macroinvertebrate communities: the role of invasive plant traits. Hydrobiologia. Vol. 684, No. 1, pp: 1-14.
  7. Sioli, H., 1975. Tropical rivers as expressions of their terrestrial environments. In: Golley, F.B., Medina, E. (Eds.). Tropical Ecological Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp: 275-288.
  8. Yokoyama, H.; Nishimura, A. and Inoue, M., 2007. Macro benthos as biological indicators to assess the influence of aquaculture on Japanese coastal environment. In: Ecological and Genetic Implication of Aquaculture Activities. Springer Publications, New York City, New York, USA. pp: 407-423.