Effects of dietary administration of probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici and multi-enzyme apsozyme on growth indices, some biochemical parameters in common carp (Cyprinus carpio)

Document Type : Animal science

Authors

Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Fisheries and Environment, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

Abstract

In this experiment the effect of dietary administration of probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici and multi-enzyme apsozyme on growth indices, some blood biochemical parameters in common carp (Cyprinus carpio). For this purpose 216 fish with average weight of 27.52±0.21 gr, were fed diets supplemented for 8 weeks. Trail was done using 8 experimental diet including probiotic (0.1%), multi-enzyme apsozyme (0.25% and 0.5%), combination of probiotic and multi-enzyme apsozyme and a control diet. At the end of feeding trial, growth indices, some blood biochemical parameters total pr, Alb, Glocuse were assessed using spectrophotometer. Results showed significant differences (P≤0.05) in weight gain, % weight gain, SGR among treatments. There was no significant difference in mentioned parameters in probiotic fed with control treatment, but significantly increased in Multi-enzyme fed  with  increasing levels (P <0.05). Also, in multi-enzyme and probiotic combination treatments, these indices showed significant increase compared to separate probiotic and multi-enzyme (P <0.05). Food conversion factor significantly decreased with increasing multi-enzyme level and in multi-enzyme and probiotic compound compare to probiotic and control diet (P <0.05). Survival percentage showed no significant difference between treatments (P≥0.05). Blood biochemical indices did not show significant difference between the amount of glucose and total protein in the control and other treatments (P≥0.05) but albumin increased in probiotic, multi enzyme and combination of  multi-enzyme and probiotic compare to control (P <0.05). The results of this experiment showed that the using multi-enzyme and probiotic can affect the growth and blood biochemical factor and improve the growth and nutrition status in Common carp.

Keywords

References

  1. Adeola, O. and Cowieson, A.J., 2011. Board-invited review: Opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve nonruminant animal production. Journal of animal science. Vol. 89, No. 10, pp: 3189-3218.
  2. Adeoye, A.A.; Yomla, R.; Jaramillo-Torres, A.; Rodiles, A.; Merrifield, D.L. and Davies, S.J., 2016. Combined effects of exogenous enzymes and probiotic on Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) growth, intestinal morphology and microbiome. Aquaculture. Vol. 463, pp: 61-70.
  3. Ai, Q.; Xu, H.; Mai, K.; Xu, W.; Wang, J. and Zhang, W., 2011. Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Bacillus subtilis and Fructooligosaccharide on Growth Performance, Survival, Non-Specific Immune Response and Disease Resistance of Juvenile Large Yellow Croaker, Larimichthys crocea. Aquaculture. Vol. 317, pp: 155-161. 
  4. Bedford, M. and Cowieson, A., 2012. Exogenous enzymes and their effects on intestinal microbiology. Animal Feed Science Technology. Vol. 173, pp: 76-85.
  5. Debidhan, B.C.; Meena, D.K.; Behera, B.K.; Das, P.; Mohapatra, P.D. and Sharma, A.P., 2014. Probiotics in fish and shellfish culture: immune modulatory and ecophysiological responses. Fish physiology and biochemistry. Vol. 40, No. 3, pp: 921-971.
  6. Francis, G.; Makkar, H.P. and Becker, K., 2001. Antinutritional factors present in plant-derived alternate fish feed ingredients and their effects in fish. Aquaculture. Vol. 199, No. 3-4, pp: 197-227.
  7. Ghomi, M.R.; Shahriari, R.; Langroudi, H.F.; Nikoo, M.; and von Elert, E., 2012. Effects of exogenous dietary enzyme on growth, body composition, and fatty acid profiles of cultured great sturgeon (Huso huso) fingerlings. Aquaculture international. Vol. 20, No. 2, pp: 249-254.
  8. Ghosh, S.; Sinha, A. and Sahu, C., 2007. Effect of probiotic on reproductive performance in female livebearing ornamental fish. Aquaculture Research. Vol. 38, No. 5, pp: 518-526.
  9. Kumar, V.; Sinha, A.K.; Makkar, H.P.S.; De Boeck, G. and Becker, K., 2012. Phytate and phytase in fish nutrition. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. Vol. 96. No. 3, pp: 335-364.
  10. Mohammadbeygi, M.; Imanpour, M.R.; Taghizadeh, V. and Shabani, A., 2012. The Application of Exogenous $-Glucanase in Barley Based Diet and its Effects on Some Hematological Parameters of Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio). World Applied Sciences Journal. Vol. 20. No. 11, pp: 1466-1471.
  11. Nayak, S.K., 2010. Probiotics and immunity: a fish perspective. Fish and shellfish immunology. Vol. 29, No.  1, pp: 2-14.
  12. Ray, A.; Ghosh, K. and Ringø, E., 2012. Enzyme-producing bacteria isolated from fish gut: a review. Aquaculture Nutrition. Vol. 18, pp: 465-492.
  13. Taridashti, F.; Zare, A.; Delafkar, Kh. and Azari Takami, Gh., 2017. Effects of probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici on growth performance, survival rate, and stress resistance of Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus). Journal of Applied Aquaculture.
  14. Zamini, A.; Kanani, H.G.; Esmaeili, A.; Ramezani, S. and Zoriezahra, S.J., 2014. Effects of two dietary exogenous multi-enzyme supplementation, Natuzyme® and beta mannanase (Hemicell®), on growth and blood parameters of Caspian salmon (Salmo trutta caspius). Comparative Clinical Pathology. Vol. 23, No. 1. pp: 187-192.
Journal of Animal Environment
Volume 10, Issue 3
October 2018
Pages 185-190

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics