Evaluation of antibiotic resistance profile and biofilm forming potential of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates

Document Type : Biology(Animal)

Authors

1 Department of Genetic and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Varamin Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin , Iran

2 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Varamin Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin , Iran

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the leading causes of hospital-acquired as well as community-acquired infections due to significant changes in microbial genetic ecology; as a result of indiscriminate use of antibiotics, the spread of multidrug resistance (MDR) is now a global problem. Its general resistance is due to a combination of factors for examples resistance genes, efflux poumps and Biofilm. The biofilms also prevent effective penetration of the antibiotics, which increasethe chances of antibiotic resistance. In the present study sixty clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosaobtained from Sina hospital. They were identified by routine standards and operative procedures; antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. The biofilm forming potential of these isolates was also evaluated using microtitre assay. Finally, a relationship between biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance was also examined. The isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa tested were found resistant to most of the antibiotics tested. Qualitative biofilm analysis revealed that most of the isolates exhibited strong biofilm production. The strong biofilm production was significantly higher in isolates that were multi-drug resistant (p =0.042). Our study indicates that multi-drug resistant, biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates are correlated. The high prevalence of biofilm producers and multiresistant P. aeruginosa isolates indicates that prevention programs need to be implemented to avoid infection in highly susceptible patients.

Keywords


  1. Abidi, S.H.; Sherwani, S.K.; Siddiqui, T.R.; Bashir, A. and Kazmi, S.U., 2013. Drug resistance profile and biofilm forming potential of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from contact lenses in Karachi-Pakistan. BMC Ophthalmol. Vol. 17, No. 13, pp: 57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-13-57.
  2. Abidi, S.H.; Sherwani, S.K.; Siddiqui, T.R.; Bashir, A. and Kazmi, S.U., 2013, Drug resistance profile and biofilm forming potential of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from contact lenses in Karachi-Pakistan. BMC Ophthalmol. Vol. 17, No. 13, pp: 57-63.
  3. Coban, A.Y.; Ciftci, A.; Onuk, E.E.; Erturan, Z. and Tanriverdi, C.Y., 2009, Durupinar, B., Investigation of biofilm formation and relationship with genotype and antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis. Mikrobiyoloji bulteni. Vol. 43, No. 4, pp: 563-573.
  4. Collee, J.M. and McCartney, M., 1989. practical medical microbiology.
  5. Fricks-Lima, J.; Hendrickson, C.M.; Allgaier, M.; Zhuo, H.; Wiener-Kronish, J.P.; Lynch, S.V. and Yang, K., 2011. Differences in biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from airways of mechanically ventilated patients and cystic fibrosis patients. nt J Antimicrob Agents. Vol. 37, No. 4, pp: 309-315.
  6. Harrison, F., 2007. Microbial ecology of the cystic fibrosis lung. Microbiology. Vol. 153, No. 4, pp: 917-923.
  7. Hassan, A.; Usman J.; Kaleem, F.; Omair, M.; Khalid, A. and Iqbal, M., 2011, Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates. Braz J Infect Dis. Vol. 15, No. 4, pp: 305-311.
  8. Hoffman, L.R.; Deziel, E.; D’Argenio, D.A.; Lepine, F.; Emerson, J. and McNamara, S., 2006. Selection for Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants due to growth in the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Vol. 103, No. 52, pp: 19890-19895.
  9. Høiby, N.A., 2017. Short history of microbial biofilms and biofilm infections. APMIS. Vol. 125, No. 4, pp: 272-275.
  10. Hou, W.; Sun, X.; Wang, Z. and Zhang, Y., 2012, Biofilm Forming Capacity of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Ocular InfectionsBiofilm-Forming Capacity of Human Flora Bacteria. Investigative ophthalmology and visual science. Vol. 53, No. 9, pp: 5624-5631.
  11. Imani Foolad, A.A.; Rostami, Z. and Shapouri R., 2010. Antimicrobial resistance and ESBL prevalence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from clinical specimen by phenotypic and genotypic methods. Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. Vol. 10, No. 3, pp: 189-191.
  12. James, G.A.; Swogger, E.; Wolcott, R.; Pulcini, Ed.; Secor, P.; Sestrich, J.; Costerton, J.W. and Stewart, P.S., 2008. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. Vol. 16, No. 1, pp: 37-44.
  13. Jensen, P.Ø.; Kolpen, M.; Kragh, K.N. and Kühl, M., 2017. Microenvironmental characteristics and physiology of biofilms in chronic infections of CF patients are strongly affected by the host immune response. APMIS, Vol. 125, No. 4, pp: 276-288.
  14. Kádár, B.; Szász, M.; Kristóf, K.; Pesti, N.; Krizsán, G. and Szentandrássy, J., 2010. In vitro activity of clarithromycin in combination with other antimicrobial agents against biofilm-forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Acta microbiologica et immunologica Hungarica. Vol. 57, No. 3, pp: 235-245.
  15. Moradali, M.F.; Ghods, S. and Rehm, B.H., 2017. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lifestyle: A Paradigm for Adaptation, Survival, and Persistence.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. Vol. 15; No. 7, pp: 39. doi: 10.3389.
  16. Wayne, P., 2007. Clinical and laboratory standards institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
  17. Yousefi, S.; Nahaei, M.; Farajnia, S.; Ghojazadeh, M.; Akhi, M. and Sharifi, Y., 2010, Class 1 integron and imipenem resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility. Iranian journal of microbiology. Vol. 2, No. 3, pp: 113-119.