Economic valuation of animal market sources (livestock and livestock production, wildlife) and plant biological resources protected areas in the market price method

Document Type : Animal environment

Authors

1 Department Of Animal Science, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran, P.O.Box: 3697-19395

2 Young Researchers and Elite Club, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract

Lashgardrar protected area is located in the eastern and southeast of Malayer with an area of 160.82 square kilometers. This area is suitable for plant and animal diversity due to natural features. The highest elevation is 2758 meters above sea level, and in terms of its natural position and topography, it has three mountainous, hilly and relatively plains.For this purpose it is necessary to accurately identify the full extent of the problem of monetary valuation of goods and services for the environmental defining. This paper presents the main findings of the protected area Lashgardar to estimate the value of goods and services provided by the natural site as a protected area is known, is determined based on the market price. Valuation of environmental assets to homogeneity with national accounts in other countries should be given instructions that the consolidated accounts of the economic system and the environmental guidelines have been developed on this basis. According to final results, the value of non-woody plants cultivated biological resources once 9891000052 rials efficiency, non-woody plants cultivated biological resources and resource efficiency Rails frequent 39453812500 74955700000 animal husbandry and wildlife resources 6272000000 dollars and an annual production of farmed animals 1395000000 rials, which is the ultimate collection of environmental assets in Rails is 131967512554.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, C.; Seroa da Motta, R.; Arigoni Ortiz, R.; Reid, J.; Ebersbach Aznar, C.; Antonio de Almeida Sinisgalli, P., 2008. The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, São Paulo State (Brazil). Ecological economics. Vol. 66, pp: 359-370.
  2. Bockstael, N.; Costanza, R.; Strand, I.; Boynton, W.; Bell, K. and Wainger, L., 1995. Analysis Ecological economic modeling and valuation of ecosystems, Ecological Economics. Vol. 14, pp: 143-159.
  3. Costanza, R.; d'Arge, R.; Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M. and Hannon, B., 1997. The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital, Ecological Economics. Vol. 25, pp: 3-15.
  4. De Groot, R.; Wilson, MA. And Boumans, RMJ., 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics. Vol. 41, No. 3, pp: 393-408.
  5. Lange, G.M. and Jiddawi, N., 2009. Economic value of marine ecosystem services in Zanzibar: implications for marine conservation and sustainable development, Ocean & Coastal Management. Vol. 52, pp: 521-532.
  6. Laurans, Y. and Mermet, L., 2014. Ecosystem services economic valuation, decision-support system or advocacy? Ecosystem Services. Vol. 7, pp: 98-105.
  7. Lee, C. and Han, S., 2002. Estimating the use and preservation values of national parks tourism resources using a contingent valuation method, Tourism Management. Vol. 23, pp: 531-540.
  8. Naidoo, R.; Paavola, J.; Strassburg, B.; Yu, D. and Balmford, A., 2008. Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research, Ecological applications. Vol. 18, pp: 2050-2067.
  9. Pearce, D. and Seccombe Hett, T., 2000. Economic valuation and environmental decision-making in Europe, Environ Sci Technol. Vol. 34, pp: 1419-1425.

 

Journal of Animal Environment
Volume 10, Issue 4
December 2018
Pages 173-178

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics