Assessing the Technology Capability for Developing New Technology Strategies Using the Panda, HEX and Majlof Model in Sina Food Industry Shelter

Document Type : Other

Authors

Department of Industrial Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

To the extent that today technology is a strategic factor for the economic development of countries and companies. With the advent of technology, the need to use modern technologies requires more technology to be evaluated, because for the purpose of determining the objectives, the existing situation and the gap between the existing and required level of capabilities must be determined.The purpose of this study was to assess the technological capability to develop new technology strategies using Panda, HEX and Majlof models in the food industry of Sina. To achieve the goal of seven questions, this research has been proposed. The research is descriptive and applied research. The statistical population of the research includes holding food industry in Sina, which includes 15 food companies. Using 48 experts, engineers and managers as the statistical sample, the required research data Six questionnaires were collected by interview and six questionnaires. Panda, HEX and Majlof models were used to analyze the data.Based on the findings of the research, the rating of strategic capabilities was 68.79%, the tactical technological capabilities score was 69.83%, and the complementary technological abilities rating was 73.25%. Also, according to the Majlouf model, the management information management system development strategies, Proper marketing, supply chain replenishment, diversification in product production, promotion and improvement of production processes have been developed as strategies for increasing technological capability along with technical support programs and projects.

Keywords

References

  1. Advanced Science and Technology Palicy Planning (ASTPP) Network. 1999. Improving Distributed Intelligence in Complex Innovation Systems. Fraunhofer Institute, Karlsruhe.
  2. Anderson, J.E., 2013. Public Policymaking, 6th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. 14 p.
  3. Ansari, M.; Dehghan Nayeri, M.; Yousefi Zenouz, R., 2009. Technological Deep Assessment of Automotive Parts Manufacturers Case of Iranian Manufacturers. International Journal of Social and Human Sciences. Vol. 3, pp: 37-46.
  4. APCTT. 1989. Atlas Technology: A Framework for Technology Planning. APCTT Publications. 327 p.
  5. Bagheri, N.; Mousavi, M. and Nasiri, M., 2011. Wind energy status of Iran: Evaluating Iran’s technological capability in manufacturing wind turbines, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 173 p.
  6. Bryson, J.M., 2014. What to Do When Stakeholders Matter. Public Management Review. Vol. 6, No. 1, pp: 21-53.
  7. Chiesa, V., 2011. R&D Strategy and Organizations: Managing Technical change in Dynamic Contexts. Imperical College Press, UK.
  8. Minzberg, H., 1992. Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science. Vol. 24, No. 9, pp: 934-948.
  9. Mohr, H., 2012. Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice. journal of Society for Philosophy and Technology. Vol. 4, pp: 22-25.
  10. Panda, H. and Ramanathan, K., 1996. Technological Capability Assessments of a Firm in the Electricity Sector. Technovation. Vol. 16, No. 10, pp: 31-44.
  11. Panda, H. and Ramanathan, K., 1997. Technological capability assessment as an input for strategic planning: case studies at Electricitd de France and Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand.

 

Journal of Animal Environment
Volume 11, Issue 1
May 2019
Pages 343-352

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics