Modeling the habitat suitability for three key species in forest habitat using HEP model (Case study: Mazandaran forest areas)

Document Type : Animal environment

Authors

Department of Environment, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Ardakan University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

Habitat is the most important factor for wild life and plant life that is necessary to protect it for sustainable development. The most important factor of threat and destruction plant and animal life is related to habitat`s changes and insecurity. With habitat Modeling we can estimate wild life species habitat suitability on a large scale without collecting a lot of information about physiological and behavioral characteristics details. With respect to the importance of habitat and problems that caused by their destruction, habitat survey and exact assessment is emergent need more than ever. In this research effective parameters have been studied in 4 forest habitat in north of country, GhadiKola, Abbandankash, Erus, Lajim, for determining habitat suitability with HEP model. This model is a quantifiable method for assessing habitats that with the lowest data, the best and most desirable result can be achieved. After library studies and checking selected stations, trapping was done in the form of transect. And then 3 indicator spices including (Lampyris Noctiluca), (Crocidura caspica / Caspian Shrew) and (Accipiter gentilis) were chosen and finally with calculating habitat suitability index (HSI) the suitability situation of each four stations was compared. Results show that each of the four stations has had a relatively good utility. in general, calculate the average utility rate in4 stands, three of them include: abbankash, erus and lajim have had the same utility with value of 67 and 68 percent's but gladiola’s station whit amount of 87 percent has had the highest utility rate. 

Keywords


  1. Brook, P., 2007. Improving habitat suitability index models, wildlife society bulletin. Vol. 35, No. 1, pp: 163-167.
  2. De Cock, R., 2018. Biology and behaviour of lampyrids. Bioluminescence in Focus: A Collection of Illuminating Essays. University of Antwerp. pp: 163-200.
  3. DFO. 2016. Review of Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) input parameters and model results for the Meadowbank Gold Mine Project. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Sci. Resp. 2016/038.
  4. Doyon, F.; Higgelke, P.E. andMacLeod, H.L., 2000. Prepared for Millar Western Forest Products’ Biodiversity Assessment Project. KBM Forestry Consultants Inc. Thunder Bay, Ontario. pp: 8-19.    
  5. Ebischer, N.J. and Robertson, P. A., 2012. Practical aspects of compositional analysis as applied to pheasant habitat. Utilization in wildlife. pp: 285-293.
  6. Eigenbrod, F.; Hecnar, S. and Fahrig, L., 2008. Accessible habitat: an improved measure of the effects of habitat loss and roads on wildlife populations. Landscape Ecology. Vol. 23, No. 2, pp: 159-168.
  7. Erfanian, B.; Mirkarimi, S.H.; Mahini, A.S. and Rezaei, H.R. A., 2013. presence-only habitat suitability. modeling for Persian leopard in Golestan National Park, Iran. Wildlife Biology. Vol. 69, No. 2, pp: 630-632.
  8. Gelbard, J. and Belnap, J., 2003.  Roads as Conduits for Exotic Plant Invasions in a Semiarid Landscape.Conservation Biology. Vol. 17, No. 2, pp: 420-432.
  9. Geneletti, D., 2003. Biodiversity Impact Assessment of roads: an approach based on ecosystem rarity. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Vol. 23, pp: 343-365.
  10. Haukos, D.A. and Smith, L.M., 1991. Vegetation management in playa lakes for wintering waterfowl. Management Note 14. Department of Range and Wildlife Management. Texas Tech University, Lubbock. 4 p.
  11. Hirzel, A. and Arlettaz,R.,2003. Modeling habitat suitability for complex species distributions by the environmental distance geometric mean. Environ Manage. Vol. 32, 614 p.
  12. Hing, S.; Narayan, E.J.; Thompson, R.C. and Godfrey, S., 2016. The relationship between physiological stress and wildlife disease: consequences for health and conservation. Ecology, Management and Conservation in Natural and Modified Habitats. Vol. 38, No. 1, pp: 309-317.
  13. Kostadin, B.G.; Thorna, S.; Zlatanovc, T.; Nikolovd, B.P.; Shurulinkove, P.; Daskalovae, G. and Gottschalkf, T. K., 2018. Evaluating the importance of managed forests as habitat for the Semicollared flycatcher. Forest Ecology and Management. Vol. 41, No. 4, pp: 123-129.
  14. Machmer, M.; Utzig, G.F.; Gates, T.M.; Savignac, C. and Dulisse, J., 2017. Development of a Northern Goshawk habitat suitability index for forest types of the Kootenay region. Conference: Proc. Biology and Management of Species and Habitats at Risk, At Kamloops, BC, Canada.
    pp: 241-246.
  15. McCrain, M. and Gerald, R., 2012. Habitat evaluation procedures (HEP) applied to mitigation banking in North Carolina, Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 45, No. 2, pp: 153-162.
  16. McGarigal, K.; Crist, M.; Roworth, E. and Romme, W.H., 2001. Cumulative effects of roads and logging on landscape structure in the San Juan Mountains, Colorado (USA). Landscape Ecology. Vol. 16. pp: 327-349.
  17. Morrison, M.L.; Marcot, B.G. and Mannan, R.W., 1992. Wildlife-habitat relationships: Concepts and applications. Madison. WI: University of Wisconsin Press. 343 p.
  18. Olivier, F. and Wotherspoon, S.J., 2006. Habitat selection Modelling, using presence-only data: Case study of a colonial hollow nesting bird, the snow petrel. Ecological Modelling. Vol. 195, pp: 187-204.
  19. Peterson, A.T.; Lash, R.R.; Carroll, D.S. and Johnson, K.M., 2006. Geographic potential for outbreaks of Marburg hemorrhagic fever. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Vol. 75, pp: 9-15.
  20. Tanaka, A., 2008. First application of Habitat Evaluation Procedure to EIA in Japan: How to quantify loss and gain of habitats. IAIA08 Conference Proceedings, 28th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment. Perth Convention Exhibition Centre, Perth. Australia. pp: 741-749.
  21. Timossi, I.C., Woodard, E.L. and Barrett, R.H., 2015, Habitat sustainability models for use with ARC/INFO. Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management Universit y of California. Berkeley and the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project. 26 p.
  22. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2010. Draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report for the Odessa Subarea Special Study, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Regiom Yakima. Washington. 128 p.
  23. Underhill, J., 2002. Roads and wildlife: A study of the effects of roads on mammals in roadside habitats. Doctor of Philosophy. School of Geography and Environmental Science. The University of Birmingham. 98 p.
  24. Wakeley, J.S., 2018. A method to create simplified versions of existing habitat suitability index models. Environmental Management. Vol. 20, No. 1, pp: 79-83.
  25. Yang, H.; Viñaa, b.A.; Tanga, Y.; Zhanga, C.J.; Wanga, F.; Zhaoa, Z. and Liua, J., 2017. Range-wide evaluation of wildlife habitat change: A demonstration using Giant Pandas. Biological Conservation. Vol. 213, No. 2, pp: 203-209.