Assessment of the Desirability of Gazella Bennettii Habitat Using the HEP Method (case study: protected area of Sangemes)

Document Type : Animal environment

Authors

1 Department of Environment, Faculty of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Desertology, Ardakan University, Ardakan, Iran

2 Department of Environmental Protection Bam, Bam, Iran

Abstract

Today, as population growth has caused extensive destruction of wildlife habitats, conservation and extension of habitats has an important role in preserving wildlife and, consequently, biodiversity. And by assessing the habitat, the quality of the habitat can be achieved easily. The protected area of Sangemes is one of the best and safest habitats of Jebir in Kerman province. The aim of this study was to determine the effective factors on Gazella bennettii 's visibility using the HEP method during the years 2016 to 2017 for spring (The promise of forgiveness), summer (heat and dehydration) and autumn (mating period). The main variables used to evaluate the habitat of the Gazella bennettii species are slope, elevation, aberration, geochemistry, distance to the water source, middle valleys. At first, the habitat was divided into three stations (mountains, hill and plains), then the variables of the index were determined using the HEP method. The results of the region's assessment were shown using the HEP method; Hill habitat in spring-summer season with HSI index, 0.89 is more desirable than other parts. Among the variables used, the biomass variability in all seasons was higher for both stations, which indicates the region's richness for species nutrition. From the results of this study, conservation and management measures can be used to increase the level of desirable habitats in Kerman province.

Keywords


  1. Canter, L.W. and Atkinson, S.F., 2011. Multiple uses of indicators and indices in cumulative effects assessment and management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Vol.31, pp: 491-501.
  2. Chandrakant Gaikwad, M. and Shivaji Narwade, S.M., 2016. The status of Chinkara Gazella bennettii (Mammalia: Cetartiodactyla: Bovidae) at Mayureshwar Wildlife sanctuary, Supe, Baramati, Pune and a note on its current Distribution in the southwestern Region of the Deccan Plateau of Maharashtra, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa. Vol. 8, No. 3, pp: 8590-8595.
  3. Dumax, N. and Rozan, A., 2011. Using an adapted HEP to assess environmental cost. Ecological Economics. Vol. 72, pp: 53-59.
  4. Douglas, H.J.; Haseltine, S.D. and Cowardin, L.M., 1994.Wildlife habitat management on the northern prairie landscape.Landscape and Urban Planning. Vol.28, pp: 5-21.
  5. Fukuda, S.H.; Tanakura, T.; Hiramatsu, K. and Harada, M., 2015.Assessment of spatial habitat heterogeneity by coupling data driven habitat suitability models with a 2D hydrodynamic model in small-scale streams.Ecological Informatics. Vol.  29, No. 2, pp :147-155.
  6. Hightower, J.E.; Harris, J.E.; Raabe, J.K.; Brownell, P. and Drew, C.A., 2012. A Bayesian Spawning Habitat Suitability Model for American Shad in Southeastern United States Rivers. Journal of Fish and WildlifeManagement. Vol. 3, No. 2, pp: 184-198.
  7. He, J.; Chun, L.J. and li, C.H., 2017.The evaluation for the impact of land use change on habitat quality: A joint contribution of cellular automata scenario simulation and habitat quality assessment model.Ecological Modelling. Vol. 366, No. 24, pp: 58-67.
  8. Herzoga, F.; Luscher, G.; Arndorfer, M.; Bogers, M.; Balazs, K.; Bunced, R.G.H.; Dennis, P.; Falusi, E.; Friedel, J.K.; Geijzendorffer, I.R.; Gomiero, T.; Jeanneret, P.; Moreno, G.; Oschatzb, M.L.; Paoletti, M.G.; Sarthou, J.P.; Stoyanova, S.; Szerencsits, E.; Wolfrum, S.; Fjellstad, W. and Bailey, D., 2017. European farm scale habitat descriptors for the evaluation of biodiversity. Ecological Indicators. Vol.77, pp: 205-217.
  9. Hindmarch, S.; Elliott, J.E., McCann, S. and Levesque, P., 2017. Habitat use by barn owls across a rural to urban gradient and an assessment of stressors including, habitat loss, rodenticide exposure and road mortality. Landscape and Urban Planning. Vol. 164, pp: 132-142.
  10. Imam, E.; Kushwaha, S.P.S.  and Singh, A., 2009. Evaluation of suitable tiger habitat in Chandoli National Park, India, using multiple logistic regression. Ecological Modelling. Vol.220, pp: 3621-3629.
  11. Makki, T.; Fakheran, S.; Moradi, H.; Iravani, M. and Senn, J., 2013. Landscape scale impacts of transportation infrastructure on spatial dynamics of two vulnerable ungulate species in Ghamishloo Wildlife Refuge, Iran. Ecological Indicators. Vol.31, pp: 6-14.
  12. Oliver,I.; Eldridge, D.G.; Nadolny, C.H. and Martin, W.K., 2014. What do site condition multi-metrics tell us about species biodiversity? Ecological Indicators. Vol. 38, pp: 262-271.
  13. Ruter, S.; Matthies, S. and Zoch, L., 2017.Applicability of Modified Whittaker plots for habitat assessment in urban forests: Examples from Hannover, Germany.Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. Vol.21, pp: 116-128.
  14. Yang, H.; Vina, A.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, F.; Zhao, Z. and Liu, J., 2017. Range-wide evaluation of wildlife habitat change: A demonstration using Giant Pandas. Biological Conservation. Vol.213, pp: 203-209.