Quantification of the Distribution and Changing Trend of the Ecological Niche of Brown Bear (Ursus arctos Linnaeus, 1758) in Ilam province

Document Type : Biodiversity

Authors

Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Malayer, Malayer, Iran

Abstract

Ecological niche is an area of one or more of the environmental factors in which the growth, reproduction and survival of a living organism is possible. In this study, Maximum entropy method was used to model the distribution and quantification of bear ecological niche in Ilam province. To select the background points, the network bias was used using the kernel density method. 70 percent of the points were used for training and 30 percent were used for the test. The results showed that the model was successful in its running (AUC = 0.97) and had a significant difference with randomized design in all thresholds (P<0.05). In order to determine the variation of the ecological niche of the species in the distribution range, a 50% threshold (0.5) was applied to the habitat suitability map and the output of this map was used to determine the grid range. Grid selection was made according to the home range. For each network, the suitability map was cut and entered the ENMtools software to determine the ecological niches breadth. Non-parametric Mann-Kendall test was used to determine the process of ecological nest width changes. The results showed that altitude, NDVI and distance from semi-dense forests had the most effect on species distribution and bears in Manesht and Qalarang areas have the highest ecological niche breadth. The trend of ecological niche showed that the breadth of ecological niche of species from the northwest of the province to the south east has a significant decreasing trend.

Keywords


  1. Ambarlı, H.; Ertürk, A. and Soyumert, A., 2016. Current status, distribution, and conservation of brown bear and wild canids (gray wolf, golden jackal, and red fox; Canidae) in Turkey. Turkish J of Zoology. Vol. 40. No. 6, pp: 944-956.
  2. Bojarska, K. and Selva, N., 2012. Spatial patterns in brown bear diet: the role of geographical and environmental factors. Mammal review. Vol. 42, pp: 120-143.
  3. Elith, J.; Phillips, S.J.; Hastie, T.; Dudík, M.; Chee, Y.E. and Yates, C.J., 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and distributions. Vol. 17, pp: 43-57.
  4. Frąckowiak, W.; Theuerkauf, J.; Pirga, B. and Gula, R., 2014. Brown bear habitat selection in relation to anthropogenic structures in the Bieszczady Mountains, Poland. Biologia. Vol. 69, No. 7, pp: 926-930.
  5. Guillera‐Arroita, G.; Lahoz‐Monfort, J.J.; Elith, J.; Gordon, A.; Kujala, H.; Lentini, P.E.; McCarthy, M.A.; Tingley, R. and Wintle, B.A., 2015. Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications. Global Ecology and Biogeography. Vol. 24, No. 3, pp: 276-292.
  6. Jerina, K.; Jonozovič, M.; Krofel, M. and Skrbinšek, T., 2013. Range and local population densities of brown bear Ursus arctos in Slovenia. European Journal of Wildlife Research. Vol. 59, No. 4, pp: 459-467.
  7. Katajisto, J. and Moilanen, A., 2006. Kernel-based home range method for data with irregular sampling intervals. Ecological Modelling. Vol. 194, No. 4, pp: 405-413.
  8. Kramer‐Schadt, S.; Niedballa, J.; Pilgrim, J.D.; Schröder, B.; Lindenborn, J.; Reinfelder, V.; Stillfried, M.; Heckmann, I.; Scharf, A.K.; Augeri, D.M. and Cheyne, S.M., 2013. The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions. Vol. 19, No. 11, pp: 1366-1379.
  9. Martin, J.; Revilla, E.; Quenette, P.Y.; Naves, J.; Allaine, D. and Swenson, J.E., 2012. Brown bear habitat suitability in the Pyrenees: transferability across sites and linking scales to make the most of scarce data. Journal of Applied Ecology. Vol. 49, No. 3, pp: 621-631.
  10. Mateo Sanchez, M.C.; Cushman, S.A. and Saura, S., 2014. Scale dependence in habitat selection: the case of the endangered brown bear in the Cantabrian Range. Inter J of Geograph Inform scie. Vol. 28, No. 8, pp: 1531-1546.
  11. May, R.; Van Dijk, J.; Wabakken, P.; Swenson, J.E.; Linnell, J.D.; Zimmermann, B.; Odden, J.; Pedersen, H.C.; Andersen, R. and Landa, A., 2008. Habitat differentiation within the large‐carnivore community of Norway's multiple‐use landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology. Vol. 45, No. 5, pp: 1382-1391.
  12. McCune, B. and Keon, D., 2002. Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load. Journal of vegetation science. Vol. 13, No. 4, pp: 603-606.
  13. Mcloughlin, P.D. and Ferguson, S.H., 2000. A hierarchical pattern of limiting factors helps explain variation in home range size. Ecoscience. Vol. 7, No. 2, pp: 123-130.
  14. Pacifici, M.; Foden, W.B.; Visconti, P.; Watson, J.E.; Butchart, S.H.; Kovacs, K.M.; Scheffers, B.R.; Hole, D.G.; Martin, T.G.; Akcakaya, H.R. and Corlett,
    R.T., 2015.
    Assessing species vulnerability to climate change. Nature climate change. Vol. 5, No. 3, p: 215.
  15. Partal, T. and Kahya, E., 2005. Trend analysis in Turkish precipitation data. Hydrological processes. Vol. 20, No. 9, pp: 2011-2026.
  16. Peers, M.J.; Wehtje, M.; Thornton, D.H. and Murray, D.L., 2014. Prey switching as a means of enhancing persistence in predators at the trailing southern edge. Global change biology. Vol. 20, No. 4, pp: 1126-1135.
  17. Phillips, S.J.; Dudík, M.; Elith, J.; Graham, C.H.; Lehmann, A.; Leathwick, J. and Ferrier, S., 2009. Sample selection bias and presence‐only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo‐absence data. Ecological applications. Vol. 19, No. 1, pp: 181-197.
  18. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P. and Schapire, R.E., 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological modelling. Vol. 190, No. 3-4, pp: 231-259.
  19. Posillico, M.; Meriggi, A.; Pagnin, E.; Lovari, S. and Russo, L., 2004. A habitat model for brown bear conservation and land use planning in the central Apennines. Biological Conservation. Vol. 118, No. 2, pp: 141-150.
  20. Preatoni, D.; Mustoni, A.; Martinoli, A.; Carlini, E.; Chiarenzi, B.; Chiozzini, S.; Van Dongen, S.; Wauters, L.A. and Tosi, G., 2005. Conservation of brown bear in the Alps: space use and settlement behavior of reintroduced bears. Acta oecologica. Vol. 28, No. 3, pp: 189-197.
  21. Radosavljevic, A. and Anderson, R.P., 2014. Making better Maxent models of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation. Journal of biogeography. Vol. 41, No. 4, pp: 629-643.
  22. Ripple, W.J.; Estes, J.A.; Beschta, R.L.; Wilmers, C.C.; Ritchie, E.G.; Hebblewhite, M.; Berger, J.; Elmhagen, B.; Letnic, M.; Nelson, M.P. and Schmitz, O.J., 2014. Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science. Vol. 343, No. 6167, p: 1241484.
  23. Roellig, M.; Dorresteijn, I.; von Wehrden, H.; Hartel, T. and Fischer, J., 2014. Brown bear activity in traditional wood-pastures in Southern Transylvania, Romania. Ursus. Vol. 25, No. 1, pp: 43-53.
  24. Salmi, T.; Määttä, A.; Anttila, P.; Ruoho-Airola, T. and Amnell, T., 2002. Detecting Trends of Annual Values of Atmospheric Pollutants by the Mann-Kendall Test and Sen’s Slope Estimates -The Excel Template Application Makesens. Finnish Meteorological Institute, Air Quality Research, Helsinki, Finland. 37 p.
  25. Su, J.; Aryal, A.; Hegab, I.M.; Shrestha, U.B.; Coogan, S.C.; Sathyakumar, S.; Dalannast, M.; Dou, Z.; Suo, Y.; Dabu, X. and Fu, H., 2018. Decreasing brown bear habitat due to climate change in Central Asia and the Asian Highlands. Ecology and Evolution. Vol. 8, pp: 11887-11899.
  26. Süel, H., 2019. Brown Bear (Ursus Arctos) Habitat Suitability Modelling and Mapping. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. Vol. 17, No. 2, pp: 4245-4255.
  27. Swenson, J.E., 2000. Action plan for the conservation of the brown bear in Europe (Ursus arctos). Nature and environment. Council of Europe. pp: 18-114.
  28. Turgay P. and Ercan, K., 2005. Trend analysis in Turkish precipitation data. Journal of Hydrological processes. Vol.  20, pp: 2011-2026.
  29. Vorsino A. E.; King C.B.; Haines W.P. and Rubinoff, D., 2013. Modeling the Habitat Retreat of the Rediscovered Endemic Hawaiian Moth Omiodes continuatalis Wallengren (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). PLoS ONE8. Vol. 1, p: e51885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051885.
  30. Ziółkowska, E.; Ostapowicz, K.; Radeloff, V.C.; Kuemmerle, T.; Sergiel, A.; Zwijacz-Kozica, T. and Selva, N., 2016. Assessing differences in connectivity based on habitat versus movement models for brown bears in the Carpathians. Landscape Ecology. Vol. 31, pp: 1863-1882.