اثر استفاده از مکمل اسید آلی در جیره های با سطوح مختلف مواد مغذی بر عملکرد، جمعیت میکروبی ایلئوم و فراسنجه های خونی جوجه های گوشتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه گنبد کاووس، گنبد کاووس، ایران

2 گروه تغذیه دام و طیور، دانشکده علوم دامی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

چکیده

این پژوهش به ­منظور بررسی تاثیر سطوح مختلف مواد مغذی و مکمل اسید آلی (بیوترونیک) بر عملکرد، جمعیت میکروبی ایلئوم و فراسنجه­ های خونی جوجه ­های گوشتی انجام گردید. 300 قطعه جوجه گوشتی سویه کاب 500 (از دو جنس) در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با آرایش فاکتوریل 3×2 در 30 واحد آزمایشی (شش تیمار و پنج تکرار) استفاده شدند. فاکتورها شامل دو سطح مکمل اسید آلی (جیره ­های حاوی 0/1 درصد اسید آلی و جیره های فاقد اسید آلی) و سه سطح مواد مغذی (سطح استاندارد، 2/5 درصد کم تر از سطح استاندارد و پنج درصد کم تر از سطح استاندارد) بودند. اثر متقابل بین اسید آلی و سطوح مختلف مواد مغذی در هیچ کدام از صفات معنی­ دار نبود. مکمل اسید آلی باعث افزایش وزن در صفر تا 21 روزگی شد (0/05>P). بین مقدار افزایش وزن جوجه ­های دریافت کننده سطوح مختلف مواد مغذی تفاوتی مشاهده نشد. مصرف خوراک تحت تاثیر اسید آلی و سطوح مواد مغذی قرار نگرفت. استفاده از اسید آلی باعث بهبود ضریب تبدیل غذایی گردید (0/05>P). اما این صفت تحت تاثیر سطوح مختلف مواد مغذی قرار نگرفت. اسید آلی تعداد کل باکتری­ ها در ایلئوم را کاهش داد (0/05>P). جمعیت میکروبی در سطوح مختلف مواد مغذی یکسان بود. استفاده از مکمل اسید آلی و سطوح مختلف مواد مغذی تاثیری بر متابولیت ­های خونی و ترکیب لاشه جوجه ­ها نداشت. به ­طور کلی تنظیم جیره تا سطح مواد مغذی کم تر از پنج درصد سطح توصیه شده کاب 500 در جوجه ­های گوشتی، تاثیر منفی بر عملکرد پرندگان نداشت. هم چنین اسید آلی باعث بهبود برخی صفات عملکردی به ­ویژه در دوره آغازین شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of organic acids supplementation in diets with different levels of nutrients on performance, ileum microbial population and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Jamaliyan 1
  • Farzad Ghanbari 1
  • Shahriar Maghsoudlou 1
  • Anwar Amoozmehr 2
1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran
2 Department of Animal and Poultry Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
چکیده [English]

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of different levels of nutrients and organic acids supplementation (Biotronic) on performance, ileum microbial populations and blood parameters of broiler chickens. Three hundred broiler chicks (Cobb500 strain, of both sex) were allotted to 6 treatments and 5 replications in completely randomized design with factorial arrangement of 2×3 and 30 experimental units. Factors included two levels of organic acid supplementation (diets containing 0.1% organic acid supplementation and diets without organic acid supplementation) and three levels of nutrients (standard levels of Cobb recommendation, 2.5% and 5% below than that). The interaction between organic acid and different dietary nutrient levels was not significant in any of the traits. Using organic acids supplementation increased growth performance at first 21 days (P<0.05). Different levels of nutrients in diet had no significant effects on growth performance. Feed intake was not affected by dietary treatments. Organic acids supplementation improved feed conversion ratio (P<0.05), whereas this trait was not affected by different levels of dietary nutrients. Organic acids decreased total bacteria counts of ileum (P<0.05). Microbial population was similar in different levels of nutrients group. Organic acids supplementation had no effects on blood metabolites and carcass composition of the broiler chicks. To sum up, feed formulation up to 5% less than Cobb500 broiler chicken nutrients recommendation had no negative significant effect on production performance of the chickens. Also, the use of dietary organic acid supplement resulted in an improvement in some productive traits especially in starter phase of growth period.      

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bacterial population
  • Biotronic
  • Blood metabolites
  • Carcass composition
  • Nutrient concentration
  1. Denil, M. and Demirel, R., 2018. Replacement of antibiotics in poultry diets. CAB Reviews. 35: 1-9.
  2. Pourmozaffar, S., Hajimoradloo, A.M., Ahmadniaye motlagh, H. and Godarzi, R., 2017. Effects of dietary organic acid and Apple cider vinegar on hepatopancreatic integrity, and gut microflora of the Litopenaeus vannamei. J of Animal Environmental. 9(3): 337-346. (In Persian)
  3. Hjati, H., 2018. Application of organic acids in poultry nutrition. International of Journal of Avian and Wildlife Biology. 4: 324-329.
  4. Józefiak, D., Kaczmarek, S., Bochenek, M. and Rutkowski, A., 2007. A note on effects of benzoic acid supplementation on the performance and microbiota populations of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. 16: 252- 256.
  5. Mirbabaie Langarooi, N., Mohammadi, M. and Roostaei Alimehr, M., 2012. Effect of Probiotic and Formic Acid on Immune System of Broilers. Iranian Journal of Animal Science. 43(4): 449-456. (In Persian)
  6. Musa, M.A.M., 2018. Evaluation of using propionic acid and live yeast in diets low in protein and energy on broiler performance. Egyptian Poultry Science. 3: 797-814.
  7. Hsiao, C.P. and Siebert, K.J., 1999. Modeling the inhibitory effects of organic acids on bacteria. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 47: 189-201.
  8. Pesti, G., Miller, B.Y. and Hargrave, J., 1992. User-Friendly Feed Formulation, Done Again (UFFDA). University of Georgia USA.
  9. SAS. 2003. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 9.1 Edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
  10. Dittoe, D.K., Ricke, S.C. and Kiess, A.S., 2018. Organic acids and potential for modifying the avian gastrointestinal tract and reducing pathogens and disease. Frontiers in Veterinary Sciences. 5: 216-228.
  11. Papatisiros, V.G., Katsoulos, P.D., Koutoulis, K.C., Karatzia, M., Dedousi, A. and Christodoulopoulos, G., 2013. Alternatives to antibiotics for farm animals. CAB Reviews: 8: 1-15.
  12. Ghahri, H., Shivazad, M., Farhumand, P., Egbal, J. and Najafzadeh, M., 2008. An investigation on the use of dietary organic acids on broiler performance. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi. 77: 26-33. (In Persian)
  13. Adil, S., Tufail, B., Gulam, A.B., Masood, S. and Manzoor, R., 2010. Effect of dietary supplementation of organic acids on performance, intestinal histo-morphology, and serum biochemistry of broiler chicken. Veterinary Medicine International. 1-7.
  14. Agboola, A.F., Omidiwura, B.R.O., Odu, O., Popoola, I.O. and Iyayi, E.A., 2015. Effects of organic acid and probiotic on performance and gut morphology in broiler chickens. South Afican J of Animal Science. 45: 494-501.
  15. Roostaei Ali Mehr, M., Moayedi Ahmadsaraei, H. and Haghighian Roudsari, M., 2014. Effect of increasing energy of diet and adding acetic acid on the performance and intestinal microflora of broilers. Iranian Veterinary Journal. 9(4): 44-54. (In Persian)
  16. Momenizadeh, Z., Maghsoudlou, Sh., Bayat Koohsar, J. and Ghanbari, F., 2020. Evaluation of probiotics and butyric acid glycerides through feed and drinking water on growth performance, carcass characteristics and gut microflora in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Environment. 12(4): 231-244. (In Persian)
  17. Kabir, S., Rahman, M., Rahman, M.B. and Ahmad, S.U., 2004. The dynamics of probiotics on growth performance and immune response in broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science. 3: 361-364.
  18. Vale, M.M do., Menten, J.F.M., Morais de, S.C.D. and Brainer, M. de A., 2004. Mixture of formic and propionic acid as additives in broiler Scientia agricola. 61: 371-375.
  19. Ghazvinian, K., Seidavi, A., Laudadio, V., Ragni, M. and Tufarelli, V., 2018. Effects of various levels of organic acids of virginiamycin on performance, blood parameters, immunoglobulins & microbial population of broiler chicks. South African society for animal science. 48: 961-967.
  20. Khosravi, A., Boldaji, F., Dastar, B. and؛ Hasani, S., 2011. Investigation the effects of using protexin, propionic acid growth promoters and blend of them on broilers performance. Veterinary Journal. 24(2): 36-42. (In Persian)
  21. Nourmohammadi, R., Hosseini, S.M. and Farhangfar, H., 2010. Effect of dietary acidification on some blood parameters and weekly performance of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 9: 3092-3097.
  22. Tahami, Z., Hosseini, S.M. and Bashtani, M., 2014. Effect of organic acids supplementation on some gastrointestinal tract characteristics and small intestine morphology of broiler chickens. Animal Production Research. 3(3): 1-10. (In Persian)
  23. Gilani, S.M.H., Zehra, S., Hassan, F., Galani, S. and Ashraf, A., 2018., Effect of natural growth promoters on immunity, biochemical & hematological parameters of broiler chickens. Tropical J of pharmaceutical research. 17: 627-633.
  24. Yesilbag, D. and Colpan, I., 2006. Effects of organic acid supplemented diets on growth performance, egg production and quality and on serum parameters in laying hens. Revue Medecine Veterinaire. 157: 280-284.
  25. Abdel-Fattah, S.A., EI-Mednay, M.H. and Abdul-Azeem, V., 2008. Thyroid activity of broiler chickens fed supplemental organic acids. International Journal of Poultry Science. 7: 215-222.
  26. Rodjan, P., Soisuwan, K., Thongprajukaew, K., Theapparat, Y., Khongthong, S., Jeenkeawpieam, J. and salaeharae, T., 2017. Effect of organic acids or probiotics alone or in combination on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, enzyme activities, ntestinal morphology and gut microflora in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 00: 1-10.
  27. Hamed, D.M. and Hassan, A.M.A., 2013. Acids supplementation to drinking water and their effects on Japanese quails experimentally challenged with Salmonella enteritidis. Research Zoology. 3: 15-22.
  28. Isazade, S., Mousavi, S.N. and Taherkhani, R., 2015. Effects of Organic Acids with Different Dietary Electrolyte Balances on Growth Performance and Intestinal Microbial Population of Broiler. Research on Animal Production. 6(12): 46-60. (In Persian)